Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite George v. Shreveport Cotton Oil Co., 38 So. 432.

51 citing documents.

Huey D. Bonnette, Et Ux. v. Ford Motor Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Bonnette v. Ford Motor Co. 88 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“[A] manufacturer is conclusively presumed to have knowledge of defects in the object it produces.” Young v. Ford Motor Co., Inc., ( , 38 So.
Aucoin v. Southern Quality Homes, LLC 984 So. 2d 685 La. 2008
Poche v. Bayliner Marine Corp. 632 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Young v. Ford Motor Co., Inc. 595 So. 2d 1123 La. 1992
Schwehm v. Superior Pontiac Co. 463 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Melancon v. Continental Oil Co. 420 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Fortmayer v. Schulingkamp 405 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
e makes the sale without revealing these defects to the purchaser, he ought to repair the damage which the latter may suffer therefrom; he ought to know what he sells, since it his own production, and, if he does not know it, there is on his part an incompetency which is a professional fault whereby he is rendered responsible for the damage.” ’ “ , 38 So.
Gustin v. Shows 377 So. 2d 1325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
4th Cir. 1977); , 38 So.
Harris v. Bardwell 373 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Clinkscales v. Superior Pontiac-GMC, Inc. 365 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
[7] Rey v. Cuccia, supra, note 4 ; , 38 So.
Muller v. AK Durnin Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. 361 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Alexander v. Burroughs Corp. 359 So. 2d 607 La. 1978
Moreno's, Inc. v. LAKE CHARLES CATHOLIC HIGH SCHS., INC. 315 So. 2d 660 La. 1975
Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc. 315 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
Peltier v. Seabird Industries, Inc. 304 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Rey v. Cuccia 298 So. 2d 840 La. 1974
Spillers v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, INC. 294 So. 2d 803 La. 1974
Baughman v. Quality Mobile Homes, Inc. 289 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 282 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
906 , 40 L.R.A.,N.S., 480 (1911); , 38 So.
Breaux v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. 282 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Criticized Fusilier v. Ardoin 266 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
374, calls attention to a line of jurisprudence in Louisiana which holds that where a good faith seller breaches an express warranty of quality, the buyer's exclusive remedy is redhibition, and he cannot bring an action for breach of contract, , 38 So.
Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of NY 250 So. 2d 754 La. 1971
906 , 40 L.R.A.,N.S., 480 (1911); , 38 So.
Compte v. Rateau 242 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Penn v. Inferno Manufacturing Corporation 199 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
* * * * * * `In the case of George v. [Shreveport] Cotton Oil Co., supra [ , 38 So.
Victory Oil Company v. Perret 183 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Tripod Boats, Inc. v. George Engine Co. 170 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Sikes v. B & S Supply, Inc. 164 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
906 , 40 L.R.A.,N.S., 480; , 38 So.
Samaha v. Southern Rambler Sales, Inc. 146 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Hermeling v. Whitmore 140 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
As stated by the Supreme Court, , 38 So.
Crowley Grain Drier, Inc. v. Fontenot 132 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Lemonier v. Coco 130 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Daly v. Abramson 117 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
"In discussing the knowledge of the vendor of a vice or defect of the thing sold, the Supreme Court, , 38 So.
Lemonier v. Coco 112 So. 2d 436 La. 1959
Bayou Rapides Lumber Co. v. Davies, supra; , 38 So.
Johnson v. Hunter 88 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
In discussing the knowledge of the vendor of a vice or defect of the thing sold, the Supreme Court, , 38 So.
Walton v. Katz & Besthoff, Inc. 77 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Tuminello v. Mawby 57 So. 2d 666 La. 1952
makes the sale without revealing these defects to the purchaser, he ought to repair the damage which the latter may suffer therefrom; he ought to know what he sells, since it is his own production, and, if he does not know it, there is on his part an incompetency which is a professional, fault whereby he is rendered responsible for the damage.'" , 38 So.
Tuminello v. Mawby 57 So. 2d 666 La. 1952
akes the sale without revealing these defects to the purchaser, he ought to repair the damage which the latter may suffer therefrom; he ought to know what he sells-, since it is his own production, and, if he does not know it, there is on his part an incompetency which is a professional fault whereby he is rendered responsible for the damage.’ ” , 38 So.
MacLehan v. Loft Candy Stores, Inc. 172 So. 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Samuel Stamping & Enameling Co. v. Monroe Furniture Co. 171 So. 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Gordon v. Bates-Crumley Chevrolet Co. 158 So. 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
505 , , wherein the court said: “We are of the opinion that the doctrine announced in [Kellogg Bridge Co. v. Hamilton] 110 U. S. [108], 3 g. Ct. [537], 28 L. Ed. [86] (the same as that expressed by Laurent) is conservative, and that a manufacturer who disposes of the things which he himself has manufactured can properl
Brewster v. Shreveport Brass Works, Inc. 141 So. 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
The Supreme Court, however, , 38 So.
Mayer Godchaux Co. v. Regan 137 So. 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
503 , ; Pere v. Dalgarn, 3 La.
Galt v. Herndon 133 So. 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Stracener v. Nunnally Bros. MoTor Co. 121 So. 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Ann. 894 ; George vs. Shreveport Cotton Oil Co., , 38 So.
Ehrlich v. Roby Motors Co. 117 So. 590 La. 1928
Barkley & Co. v. Burguieres Co. 7 La. App. 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Silk v. Crosset Shoe Shop 6 La. App. 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
In the case of George vs. Shreveport Cotton Oil Co., , 38 So.
Johness v. Jahncke, Inc. 4 La. App. 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
R. C. C., 2531; George vs. Shreveport Cotton Mill Oil Co., , 38 South.
Henderson v. Leona Rice Milling Co. 107 So. 459 La. 1926