DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wilson, 38 So. 397.

17 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Deon Ray Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    [i]t is not essential that the act of the defendant should have been the sole cause of the death; if it hastened the termination of life, or contributed, mediately or immediately, to the death, in a degree 17 sufficient to be a clearly contributing cause, that is sufficient.” Matthews, 450 So.2d at 646 ( So.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Walter Rosario-Colon La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Willie James Robertson 172 So. 3d 616 La. 2015
    ‘[i]t is not essential that the act of the defendant should have been the sole cause of the death; if it hastened the termination of life, or contributed, mediately or immediately, to the *619 death, in a degree sufficient to be a clearly contributing cause, that is sufficient.’ ” ( , 38 So.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kearney Alsandor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    The supreme court has held that “‘[i]t is not essential that the act of Defendant should have been the sole cause of the death; if it hastened the termination of life, or contributed, mediately or immediately, to the death, in a degree sufficient to be a clearly contributing cause, that is sufficient.’ So.
  • State v. ALSANDOR 970 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Hart 881 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Obney 746 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 10/5/94) ; , writ denied, 94-2724 (La.2/9/95); , , 38 So.
  • State v. Richardson 729 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. MacKey 687 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Mosely 475 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hamilton 459 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    In response, the Durio court stated: , 38 So.
  • State v. Matthews 450 So. 2d 644 La. 1984
  • State v. Durio 371 So. 2d 1158 La. 1979
  • State v. Boulanger 63 So. 607 La. 1913
    The following authorities on the subject of the application for a new trial are in point: , 38 South.
  • Vaccaro v. Pigniolo 57 So. 787 La. 1912
    974 ; Lisso & , 38 South.
  • Wells v. Blackman 46 So. 437 La. 1908
    974 ; Lisso & , 38 South.