Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Johnston, 42 So. 357.

16 citing documents.

Jeffer v. Zahn 148 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
436 ; Fidelity & , 42 So.
Groner v. Capitol Syrup Co. 10 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1942
Douglas Public Service Corporation v. Leon 200 So. 21 La. 1941
In Fidelity & , 42 So.
Del Bondio v. Albrecht 181 So. 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Conklin v. Caffall 179 So. 434 La. 1938
716, 722 ; and Fidelity & , 42 So.
Waterman v. Dupeire 156 So. 405 La. 1934
Article 3158 of the Civil Code, as finally amended by Act No. 157 of 1900, “expressly does away with all formalities in the pledging of negotiable notes except the delivery thereof to the pledgee,” Fidelity & , 42 So.
Bank of Minden & Trust Co. v. Barron 152 So. 746 La. 1934
Ott v. Sanders 147 So. 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Hollingsworth v. Ratcliff 110 So. 422 La. 1926
Louisiana Loan & Investment Corp. v. St. John 4 La. App. 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
138 ; Fidelity & Deposit Co. vs. Johnson, , that Article 3170 of *258 the Civil Code authorizes a pledgee as owner of the pledge to suei the pledgee direct to obtain the sale of the pledge for the satisfaction of the debt to secure which it was given.
Holmes & Barnes v. Shawnee Milling Co. 4 La. App. 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
309 ; Fidelity and Deposit Company vs. Johnson, , 42 South.
Gresham v. Graves 3 La. App. 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Fidelity & Deposit Co. vs. Johnston, , 42 South.
Steeg v. Codifer 102 So. 407 La. 1924
St. Tammany Bank & Trust Co. v. Mackie Pine Products Co. 101 So. 266 La. 1924
Fidelity & , 42 South.
Freiler Mercantile Co. v. Chaney 83 So. 436 La. 1919
It was held in Fidelity Deposit & , 42 South.
Swift v. Bonvillain 71 So. 849 La. 1916
834 , it was held that no intent was shown “to defraud * * * or give an unfair preference.” Fidelity & , 42 South.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by