Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kansas City, S. & G. Ry. Co. v. Louisiana W. R., 40 So. 627.
-
Texas Pipe Line Company v. Stein
190 So. 2d 244
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
v. Louisiana W. R. R., , 40 So.
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. New Orleans Term. Co. 156 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
-
Calcasieu & S. Ry. Co. v. Kinder Canal Co.
69 So. 2d 537
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
See also Kansas City, S. & , 40 So.
-
Calcasieu & S. Ry. Co. v. Bel
69 So. 2d 40
La. 1953
See also Kansas City, S. & , 40 So.
-
Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Callahan
65 So. 2d 608
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1953
e power which is to be delivered to the location of the pipe line station, is to be available at once to the whole area surrounding the station, as well .as the area covered by the line between Abbeville and the City of New Iberia.- This identical question was considered by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case of Kansas City S. & , 40 So.
-
City of Shreveport v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.
190 So. 404
La. 1939
In the case of Kansas City, S. & , 40 So.
- Gumbel v. New Orleans Terminal Co. 173 So. 518 La. 1937
-
City of Shreveport v. Kansas City, S. & G. Ry. Co.
166 So. 471
La. 1936
452; Kansas City, S. & , 40 So.
-
City of Shreveport v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.
161 So. 12
La. 1935
The appellees cite, and seem to rely upon, the following cases: Kansas City, S. & , 40 So.
-
River & Rail Terminals, Inc. v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.
130 So. 337
La. 1930
740 , 81 S. E. 1104 ; K. C., S. & , 40 So.
-
K. C. S. & G. Ry. Co. v. Meyer
120 So. 700
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Co. vs. Louisiana W. R. Co., , 40 So.
- Vicksburg v. LouisiAna & A. R. 67 So. 553 La. 1915
- Tremont & Gulf Ry. Co. v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co. 54 So. 826 La. 1911
-
Louisville & N. R. v. New Orleans Terminal Co.
45 So. 962
La. 1908
In Kansas City, S. & , 40 South.