Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Davis v. Arkansas Southern R., 41 So. 587.

37 citing documents.

Jarreau v. Jarreau 268 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Succession of Guidry v. Bank of Terrebonne & Trust Co. 193 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Oliver v. Shreveport Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service Board 88 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
White v. Lockhart 86 So. 2d 397 La. 1956
Reynolds Metal Co. v. TL James & Co. 69 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
McGee v. Police Jury of Caddo Parish 66 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
See: Davis v. Arkansas Southern R. Co., 1906, , 41 So.
Wolfson v. Succession of Lisso 13 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1943
Item Co. v. De Lerno 10 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Gast v. Gast 3 So. 2d 173 La. 1941
Conner v. Harper 2 So. 2d 177 La. 1941
Bates v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America 190 So. 120 La. 1939
Succession of Thompson 186 So. 1 La. 1938
Pierce v. Robertson 182 So. 544 La. 1938
Smith v. Monroe Grocery Co. 171 So. 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Lejeune v. Lejeune 167 So. 747 La. 1936
McCoy v. Arkansas Natural Gas Co. 165 So. 632 La. 1936
Payton v. Ideal Savings & Homestead Ass'n 160 So. 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
State v. Johnson 160 So. 788 La. 1935
Crescent Cigar & Tobacco Co. v. Mire 145 So. 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Foster, Hall, Barret Smith v. Haley 142 So. 251 La. 1932
Palmer v. Oscar Dowling Food Products, Inc. 142 So. 127 La. 1932
Garland v. Keen 139 So. 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Flotte v. Thomas Egan's Sons, Inc. 137 So. 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Reed v. Warren 136 So. 59 La. 1931
328 , , where the defendant filed an exception of no cause or right of action, instead of an exception of nonjoinder or want of proper parties, to the suit brought by the widow of a man.
Petty v. Jones 121 So. 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
dgment sustaining an exception of no right of action, aimed at the merits of the plaintiff’s demand, and assuming the case to be stated completely in the petition, is a basis for the plea of res judicata the same as if the judgment had been rendered on evidence in the case.” Along these same lines we find a most interesting discussion by Mr. Justice Nicholls in Davis vs. Arkansas Southern R. Co., , 41 So.
Hart v. Standard Oil Co. 121 So. 737 La. 1929
In support of this contention they cite the following eases: , 41 So.
Meridian Lbr. Co. v. Holt 120 So. 233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1929
Davis vs. Arkansas Southern R. R., , 41 So.
Kunnes v. Kogos 119 So. 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Ruiz v. American Trading Co. 118 So. 597 La. 1928
Comeaux v. Miles 118 So. 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Davis vs. Arkansas Southern R. Co., , 41 So.
Hotard v. Perilloux 7 La. App. 281 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1927
Ann. 524 ; Davis vs. Arkansas Southern, , 41 So.
Northwestern Bottle Co. v. Rosen 8 La. App. 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
761 ; Davis vs. Arkansas Southern R. Co., , 41 So.
Triggs v. George 4 La. App. 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Davis vs. Arkansas Southern R. Co., , 41 South.
Dubach Mill Co. v. M. M. Carroll Lumber Co. 4 La. App. 207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1926
This, we think, is also not important; for if plaintiff’s petition only alleges a joint indebtedness, an exception of no cause of action cannot be sustained, for: “When a petition discloses a cause of action as to any portion of the amount sued for, an exception of no cause of action should be dismissed.” Davis vs. Arkansas Southern R. R. Co., , 41 South.
Delaney v. Little 3 La. App. 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Davis vs. Arkansas Southern R. R. Co., , 41 South.
Jacob Fallo, Inc. v. Durr 5 Pelt. 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1922
Davis vs. Arkansas Southern R. R. Co., .
Coleman v. Continental Bank & Trust Co. 72 So. 742 La. 1916