Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thibodeaux v. Thibodeaux, 36 So. 800.

27 citing documents.

Osborn v. Johnston 308 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Lemoine v. Lemoine 295 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Middle Tennessee Council, Inc. v. Ford 274 So. 2d 173 La. 1973
Middle Tennessee Council, Inc. v. Ford 256 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
The “defect of substance” , 36 So.
MIDDLE TENNESSEE COUNCIL, INC. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA v. Ford 205 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Bordelon v. Bordelon 180 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Caldwell v. Hay 170 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Placid Oil Company v. AM Dupont Corporation 156 So. 2d 444 La. 1963
Blackwell v. Nagy 122 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
* * * “Thibodeaux v. Thibodeaux, 1904, , 36 So.
Acadian Production Corp. v. Savanna Corp. 63 So. 2d 141 La. 1953
Norah v. Crawford 49 So. 2d 751 La. 1950
Dileo v. Dileo 46 So. 2d 53 La. 1950
Niette v. Stringfellow 3 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Wetherbee v. Lodwick Lumber Co. 193 So. 671 La. 1940
Murray v. Hardee 189 So. 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
The Supreme Court gave consideration to Civil Code, article 3543, quoted supra, , 36 So.
Ph&338nix Building Homestead Ass'n v. Meraux 180 So. 648 La. 1938
Arceneaux v. Cormier 144 So. 722 La. 1932
914 , , it is said: “But the law requires that the property of a succession shall be inventoried and appraised (Civ.
Aucoin v. Engeron 115 So. 576 La. 1928
Bauman v. Pennywell 107 So. 425 La. 1926
Colfax Motor Co. v. O'Quinn 2 La. App. 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Thibodeaux vs. Thibodeaux, , 36 South.
Chenault v. Howard 92 So. 587 La. 1922
“Ownership is, however, the basis of the action of partition and must be alleged and proved,” , 36 South.
Tyler v. Lewis 78 So. 477 La. 1918
Huckaby v. Huckaby 63 So. 755 La. 1913
rovisions and adjudged cases on the subject-matter, held the rule to be that, on the application of a succession representative for a sale to pay debts, the property of the estate ‘can be legally sold for less than the appraisement thereof, but not for less than two-thirds thereof at the first offering.’ The question thus adjudicated was set at rest by that decision.” , 36 South.
Lacroix v. Crane 62 So. 657 La. 1913
Hughes v. Edson 57 So. 154 La. 1911
Thibodeaux v. Thibodeaux 52 So. 773 La. 1910
Gary v. Landry 47 So. 124 La. 1908