Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stewart v. Arkansas Southern R., 36 So. 676.
-
Hanna v. Roussel
803 So. 2d 261
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
3d Cir.2/2/94), , writ denied, 94-0545 (La.4/22/94), ; see also, , 36 So.
-
Hanna v. Roussel
803 So. 2d 261
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
3d Cir.2/2/94), , writ denied, 94-0545 (La.4/22/94), ; see also, , 36 So.
- Clomon v. Monroe City School Bd. 572 So. 2d 571 La. 1991
- Clomon v. Monroe City School Bd. 490 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- Jilek v. Colonial Penn Insurance Co. 468 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Danos v. St. Pierre 402 So. 2d 633 La. 1981
- Danos v. St. Pierre 383 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
-
Todd v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
219 So. 2d 538
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
203 (Orl.La.App.1937); , 36 So.
- Rezza v. Cziffer 186 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
- Duet v. Cheramie 176 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
-
Land v. Colletti
79 So. 2d 641
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Stewart v. Arkansas Southern R. *644 Co., , 36 So.
- Augustine v. Blasini 176 So. 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
-
Pecoraro v. Kopanica
173 So. 203
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
he Civil Code, which declares that every act whatever of man that causes damages to another obliges him by whose fault it happened to repair it, it is at least recognized that the physical consequences resulting from fright may be properly considered in estimating damages, although the fright was unaccompanied by a contemporaneous physical injury.” , 36 So.
-
Jones v. Pierce
162 So. 214
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
As supporting this view, , 36 So.
- Stortz v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 141 So. 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
-
Arthus v. Arthus
124 So. 676
La. 1929
In disposing of that phase of the case, the court, at,page 763 of the opinion, , said : “The Code of Practice does not contemplate that third persons may be made parties, and new issues urged against them.
-
Laird v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, Inc.
120 So. 692
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
In Stewart vs. Arkansas Southern Railway Company, , 36 So.
-
Youman v. McConnell & McConnel, Inc.
7 La. App. 315
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
In the second case, Stewart vs. Railroad Co., , 36 So.
- Fincher v. Meyer-Greenwald Construction Co. 2 La. App. 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
-
Cooper v. Blanck
39 So. 2d 352
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1923
763 , , where the Court was considering the question of whether fright occasioned by the negligence of another was properly an item in a claim for damages, a number of decisions of the common law were cited as stating the contrary view, but the Court said, 112 La.