Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite New Orleans Terminal Co. v. Teller, 37 So. 624.

13 citing documents.

Calcasieu & S. Ry. Co. v. Bel 69 So. 2d 40 La. 1953
the following cases: , 37 So.
Community Chest v. Union Mission Ass'n 30 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
New Prytania Market Ass'n v. Beoubay 185 So. 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
That a corporation, itself a legal entity, with power to sue and to be sued, need not appear through any particular officer, was held in New Orleans Terminal Company *533 v. Teller, , 37 So.
Stallings v. Stallings 154 So. 729 La. 1934
There must be prejudice to the appellant, and the prejudice must be such as cannot be remedied on the appeal, but only by another trial.” 736 , 37 So.
State Ex Rel. Russell v. Richardson 152 So. 748 La. 1934
Berger v. Quintero 127 So. 356 La. 1930
There must be prejudice to the appellant, and the prejudice must be such as cannot be remedied on the appeal, but only by another trial.” , 37 So.
Interstate Trust & Banking Co. v. Lichtenteg 118 So. 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
736 , , the Court refers with approval to the case of Lacaze & Reine vs. Their Creditors, and holds: “The second exception was founded on the fact that neither the name of the president nor of any other officer of plaintiff corporation was stated in the petition, but only that of the 'corporation was stated.
Kansas City, S. & G. Ry. Co. v. Meyer 117 So. 765 La. 1928
Victory Oil Co. v. Von Schlemmer 7 La. App. 289 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1927
New Orleans Terminal Co. vs. Teller, (736), 37 South.
Overruled Town of Minden v. Stewart 77 So. 118 La. 1917
This court has again and again animadverted upon the deplorable practice of referring to the.merits exceptions that do not involve the merits.” , 37 South.
Orleans-Kenner Electric Ry. Co. v. Metairie Ridge Nursery Co. 68 So. 93 La. 1915
Layne & Bowler Co. v. Town of Winnfield 64 So. 127 La. 1914
Southern Sawmill Co. v. Ducote 46 So. 20 La. 1908