Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fontenot, 36 So. 630.
- New Iberia Firefighters Assoc.,local 755 v. City of New Iberia La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
- Watkins v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 145 So. 3d 237 La. 2014
- New Iberia Firefighters Ass'n, Local 775 v. City of New Iberia 140 So. 3d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- City of DeQuincy v. Henry 62 So. 3d 43 La. 2011
- Wade Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. 997 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- State v. Jones 983 So. 2d 95 La. 2008
-
Burmaster v. Plaquemines Parish Government
982 So. 2d 795
La. 2008
1 Cir. 5/9/03) , , writ denied, 03-2678 (La.12/12/03), ( , 36 So.
- Colvin v. LOUISIANA PATIENT'S COMP. FUND 947 So. 2d 15 La. 2007
- Moss v. State 925 So. 2d 1185 La. 2006
- Breaux v. Lafourche Parish Council 851 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- State v. Williams 449 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- Vinturella v. Unangst 440 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Brown
378 So. 2d 916
La. 1979
The common law rule of strict construction of penal statutes ( , 36 So.
- Louisiana Television Broadcasting Corp. v. TOTAL CATV 341 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Higgins, Inc. v. Walker 129 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
- State v. Orleans Parish School Board 118 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
- State v. Peterson 95 So. 2d 608 La. 1957
- State v. Viator 87 So. 2d 115 La. 1956
- State v. Viator 87 So. 2d 115 La. 1956
- St. Martin Parish Police Jury v. Iberville Parish Police Jury 33 So. 2d 671 La. 1947
- State v. Vaccaro 8 So. 2d 299 La. 1942
-
State v. Dark
196 So. 47
La. 1940
721 ; State v. Fontenot; , 36 So.
- State v. Clement 193 So. 685 La. 1940
- State v. Whitlock 192 So. 697 La. 1939
-
Jackson State Nat. Bank v. Merchants' Bank & Trust Co.
149 So. 539
La. 1933
No sentence, clause or word should be construed as unmeaning and surplusage, if a construction can be legitimately found which will give force to and preserve all the words of the statute.” Black on Interpretation, p. 83; , 36 So.
- Simmons v. Victory Industrial Life Ins. Co. 139 So. 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
-
Succession of Hill
116 So. 175
La. 1928
Justice Martin, for the court, ¡said: “In the present ease, it is impossible to conclude that the testatrix meant under the expression ‘mon mobilier’ to bequeath her money, jewels, and plate; for she begins by bequeathing $1,000, then her jewels, then her plate.” Appellant’s , 36 So.
- Vander Sluys v. Finfrock 103 So. 730 La. 1925
- State v. McClellan 98 So. 748 La. 1923