Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rhodes v. Cooper, 37 So. 527.

15 citing documents.

Succession of Jarreau 289 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Fontenot v. Derbonne 109 So. 2d 85 La. 1959
C. W. Greeson Co. v. Harnischfeger Corp. 54 So. 2d 528 La. 1951
Lopez v. Lopez 23 So. 2d 104 La. 1945
Succession of Singer 23 So. 2d 184 La. 1945
efinitively on the cause, in the state in which it is, either because the parties have failed to adduce the necessary testimony, or because the inferior court refuse'to receive it, or otherwise, it may, according to circumstances, remand the cause to the lower court, with instructions as to the testimony which it shall receive, to the end that it may decide according to law.” , 37 So.
Hines v. Schumpert 7 So. 2d 39 La. 1942
See Article 906, Code of Practice; , 37 So.
Sterkx v. Sterkx 190 So. 628 La. 1939
Walker v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co. of Nashville 184 So. 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Dreher v. Guaranty Bond & Finance Co. 165 So. 711 La. 1936
Jeanfreau v. Jeanfreau 162 So. 3 La. 1935
Longing v. Home Ins. Co. 138 So. 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
McDaniel v. Roseland Box Co. 136 So. 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
L. A. Frey & Sons, Inc. v. Town of Slidell 137 So. 193 La. 1927
Duprat v. Powell 111 So. 259 La. 1927
Vestal v. Producers' Oil Co. 66 So. 334 La. 1914
or part of the succession separately, or all the coheirs have possessed separately each a portion of the hereditary' effects, he or they who have thus separately possessed, can successfully oppose the suit for a partition of the effects of the succession, if their possession has continued thirty years without interruption.” , 37 South.