Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lockhart v. Lockhart, 37 So. 860.
- State v. United Dredging Co. 50 So. 2d 826 La. 1951
-
Evans v. Hamner
24 So. 2d 814
La. 1946
The decision rendered by the district court on this subject, and affirmed by the court of appeal, is supported by the following decision by this court: , 37 So.
- Senseley v. First Nat. Life Ins. Co. 16 So. 2d 906 La. 1944
- Sandfield Oil Gas Co. v. Paul 7 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- Long v. Chailan 199 So. 222 La. 1940
-
Harrisonburg-Catahoula State Bank v. Meyers
185 So. 96
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
[872] 874, ; Teutonia Loan & Building Co. v. Connolly, 133 La.
-
Succession of Bonnette
176 So. 397
La. 1937
Article 3519, Rev.Civ.Code, as amended by Act No. 107 of 1898; , 37 So.
-
Cocke v. Cavalier
143 So. 33
La. 1932
The purpose of the amendment was “to substitute certainty for uncertainty.” , 37 So.
-
Verrett v. Savoie
141 So. 854
La. 1932
874 , ; Teutonia Loan & Building Co. v. Connolly, 133 La.
-
Jones v. American Bank & Trust Co.
143 So. 35
La. 1932
hout having taken any steps in the prosecution thereof, he shall be considered as having abandoned the same.” I. This order was entered by the court below on September 19, 1929, on motion of defendant made on the same day, suggesting that more than five years had then elapsed since plaintiff had taken any steps in the prosecution of his suit, , 37 So.
-
Losch v. Greco
136 So. 572
La. 1931
874 , , it was said, after quoting articles 3518 and 3519 of the Code: .
- Eichelberger v. B. &. T. Const. Co. 137 So. 194 La. 1931
- Augusta Sugar Co. v. Haley 112 So. 731 La. 1927
-
Nix v. Lancaster
3 La. App. 402
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Article 3519 of the Civil Code, as amended by Act 107 of 1898, reads in part as follows: *404 “Whenever the plaintiff, having made his demand, shall at any time before obtaining final judgment allow five years to elapse without having taken any steps in the prosecution thereof, he shall be considered as having abandoned the same.” In the case of Lockhart vs. Lockhart, , 37 South.
- Charbonnet v. State Realty Co. 99 So. 865 La. 1923
-
Teutonia Loan & Building Co. v. Connolly
63 So. 63
La. 1913
In passing upon tbe amendment to article 3519, , 37 South.
- Howcott v. Petit 58 So. 574 La. 1912
- City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Jockey Club 55 So. 711 La. 1904