Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sharp v. Zeller, 38 So. 449.
- Diane M. Sheridon, Born Richard v. Jonathan Sheridon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Sheridon v. Sheridon 867 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Ainsworth v. Ainsworth 860 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
- Aymond v. Aymond 758 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
- Harmon v. Harmon 617 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- Michel v. Michel 484 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Beavers v. Stephens 341 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
- American Bank & T. Co. v. Blue Bird Restaurant & L. 294 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
- Succession of Delesdernier 184 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
- Arcemont v. Arcemont 162 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
-
Keller v. Thompson
121 So. 2d 575
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
These authorities are without application to the issues presented in the instant case as they involve either facts clearly distinguishable or partition or other forms of accounting procedures, as will be disclosed by a mere reading thereof, , 38 So.
- Williams v. Williams 17 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
- Carbajal v. Bickmann 187 So. 53 La. 1939
-
Snyder v. Davidson
129 So. 185
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
le to suppress the inclination to remark that though the judgment appears to us most unusual in form there is in the record ample expert testimony in support of plaintiffs’ contention that it conforms with the laws and customs of Ohio, and no one will deny that in order to determine just what a judgment means recourse may be had to the entire record, pleadings, , 38 So.
- Murphy v. Murphy 66 So. 382 La. 1914
-
Timberlake v. Sorrell
51 So. 586
La. 1910
The cases apparently to the contrary, , 38 South.