No. 15,396
Precedential
Affirmed.
Processed
State v. Richardson
State v. Richardson, 37 So. 599 (La. 1904).
Cited by
- State v. Vargas 138 So. 3d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
- Glapion v. Bergeaux 834 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- State v. Harrison 501 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. Hall 464 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Luckett 327 So. 2d 365 La. 1976
Opinion text
PROVOSTY, J. The defendant is not represented hy counsel in this court. There is no hill of exceptions or assignment of error in the record to show upon what defendant relies for a reversal of the judgment. The court has examined the record carefully, and does not find that any error has been committed to the prejudice of the defendant in the course of the trial. Judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.