Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Maloney, 39 So. 539.

15 citing documents.

Gremillion v. Lancaster 244 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Gremillion v. Lancaster 244 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
State v. Hudson 221 So. 2d 484 La. 1969
State v. McDonell 23 So. 2d 230 La. 1945
State v. Daspit 118 So. 690 La. 1928
State v. Mullins 116 So. 393 La. 1928
Anselmo v. Pisciotta 6 La. App. 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
509 , , the court said: “The right accorded .to parties convicted of crime to apply for a new trial, and the power and authority conferred upon district courts to grant the same, is the great remedy afforded by the lawmaker for the ascertainment and correction of any errors and resulting injury which may have taken place in
State v. Egan 105 So. 288 La. 1925
State v. Foster 101 So. 255 La. 1924
State v. Austin 76 So. 809 La. 1917
State v. Hollingsworth 68 So. 834 La. 1915
in an unappealable ease, it will not, in any criminal case, whether appealaable or unappealable, deal with questions of fact, other than such facts as may be involved in the rulings of the trial judge upon matters which, in a case triable by jury, are left to him, rather than to the jury, to determine, , 39 South.
State v. Schofield 67 So. 557 La. 1915
State v. Glover 51 So. 677 La. 1910
396 ; State v. Maloney, *657 , 39 South.
State v. Moore 44 So. 299 La. 1907
State v. Goodson 40 So. 771 La. 1906