Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ackerman v. Larner, 40 So. 581.
- State v. Stringer 496 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- State v. Edwards 420 So. 2d 663 La. 1982
- Marshall v. Wells 381 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
- Dubois v. Hand 342 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
-
State v. Muse
319 So. 2d 920
La. 1975
99 , (1906); State v. McCoy, 109 La.
-
Placid Oil Company v. Taylor
291 So. 2d 892
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
[459] 460 (1867); , 40 So.
-
State v. Giordano
249 So. 2d 558
La. 1971
99 , (1906); State v. McCoy, 109 La.
- Williams v. Collier 249 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
- Prestridge v. Humble Oil & Refining Company 131 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
- Ducote v. Stark 87 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
- Young v. Charity Hospital of La. at New Orleans 77 So. 2d 13 La. 1954
-
Davis v. Radoste
75 So. 2d 230
La. 1954
LSA-Civil Code Article 1497, , 40 So.
- Fried v. Bradley 52 So. 2d 247 La. 1951
- Kennedy v. Johnson Lumber Co. 33 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
- Whitman v. Whitman 18 So. 2d 633 La. 1944
- S. P. Weaver Lumber & Supply Co. v. Price 17 So. 2d 917 La. 1944
- Boxwell v. Department of Highways 14 So. 2d 627 La. 1943
- Boxwell v. Department of Highways 14 So. 2d 627 La. 1943
- Whitney Nat. Bank of New Orleans v. Schwob 13 So. 2d 782 La. 1943
- Rhodes v. Miller 179 So. 430 La. 1938
-
State v. Gunter
177 So. 60
La. 1937
99 , ); that the district attorney did not try the case again but instead placed the case on the dead docket where it remained without being disturbed until after the trial of defendant’s motion to quash, when the present district attorney entered a nolle prosequi; and that the juror had lived during all these years in the
- Litton v. Stephens 175 So. 619 La. 1937
-
State v. Sharp
141 So. 859
La. 1932
99 , , said: “Where there are several counsel, the court may limit to one counsel the examination of each witness.
- Succession of Spann 125 So. 289 La. 1929
-
Armand v. Armand
8 La. App. 810
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
(Ackerman vs. Larner, , 40 So.
- Ely v. Coreil 116 So. 834 La. 1928
-
Ford v. Calhoun
6 La. App. 350
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Ackerman vs. Larner, , 40 South.
-
Maxwell v. Maxwell
1 La. App. 413
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
“A married woman, living in community with her husband, may be held liable on contracts, made by her, which enure to her separate benefit, when to hold otherwise would be to enable her to perpetrate a fraud.” Ackerman vs. Larner, , 40 South.
- Welch v. Forest Lumber Co. 92 So. 400 La. 1922
- Jenkins v. Svarva 60 So. 232 La. 1912
- Kelly v. Kelly 60 So. 671 La. 1912
-
Barringer v. Dauernheim
53 So. 923
La. 1910
That equitable considerations such as would ordinarily sustain an estoppel cannot be allowed to override motives of public policy, , 40 South.
- Louisiana Ry. & Navigation Co. v. Holly 53 So. 882 La. 1910
- Baker v. Baker 52 So. 115 La. 1910
-
Thielman v. Gahlman
44 So. 123
La. 1907
a consideration which, in all probability, had no existence, and which, in any event, would have been insufficient under our law, but the party has shown (to use the language of the law) “the existence of a true and sufficient consideration,” and (again quoting the text of the law) “the contract cannot be invalidated.” , 1 to the effect that “contracts whereby individuals have transferred their property to others, burdened with the charge that they should be maintained during their lives, have h
- Ackermann v. Larner 44 So. 452 La. 1907