DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mullen v. Kerlec, 40 So. 46.

14 citing documents.

  • Board of Com'rs v. Turner Marine Bulk 629 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • Keever v. Knighten 532 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    783 , (1905); Commercial *828 (La.App.
  • Davilla v. Jones 436 So. 2d 507 La. 1983
    783 , 785, (1905), this court stated: "The Civil Code seems plain enough that the right of the lessee to make indispensable repairs at the expense of the lessor arises only after calling on the lessor to make such repairs and after his refusal or neglect to make them.
  • Commercial Equipment Distributors, Inc. v. Anderson 431 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • G. Woodward Jackson Co., Inc. v. Crispens 414 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    783 , (1905); Hartz v. Stauffer, 163 La.
  • Lassen v. Otalvaro 391 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
  • Shear v. Castrinos 327 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
  • Cameron v. Krantz 299 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    783 , (1905); Bruno v. Louisiana School Supply Company, Inc., (La.App.
  • Brignac v. Boisdore 288 So. 2d 31 La. 1973
    783 , (1905); Hartz v. Stauffer, 163 La.
  • Bruno v. Louisiana School Supply Company, Inc. 274 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
  • Miami Truck & Motor Leasing Co. v. Dairyman, Inc. 263 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Teekell v. Drewett 103 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    783 , , the Court has this to say concerning said Article No. 2694, to-wit: “ ‘The Civil Code seems plain enough that the right of the lessee to make indispensable repairs at the expense of the lessor arises only after calling on the lessor to make such repairs and after his refusal or neglect to make them.
  • Ellis v. Brenner 34 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    783 , , the Court has this to say concerning said Article No. 2694, to-wit: "The Civil Code seems plain enough that the right of the lessee to make indispensable repairs at the expense of the lessor arises only after calling on the lessor to make such repairs and after his refusal or neglect to make them.
  • Davis v. McConnell 146 So. 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933