No. 15,828
Precedential
Reversed.
Processed
Fontelieu v. Fontelieu
Fontelieu v. Fontelieu, 41 So. 120 (La. 1906).
Cited by
- Morris, Lee & Bayle, LLC v. Macquet 192 So. 3d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- Karl E. Kimsey v. National Automotive Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
- Kimsey v. National Automotive Insurance Co. 153 So. 3d 1035 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- Nesbitt v. Nesbitt 79 So. 3d 347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
- Elston v. Montgomery 70 So. 3d 824 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
- Deano & Deano, Inc. v. Succession of Ricks 15 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- Succession of Jenkins 936 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- Williams v. Enriquez 915 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
- Vanderbrook v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. 818 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Succession of Jones 193 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
- Callahan v. Authement 99 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- Lacaze v. Hardee 7 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Opinion text
On Rehearing. On the application for rehearing the attention of the court is called to the fact that the minor defendant, having necessarily accepted the succession of his deceased father with benefit of inventory, ought not to be condemned beyond the property inherited. It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment heretofore handed down be amended in so far as to restrict the execution thereof, as against the minor defendant, Theodore Fontelieu, Jr., to the property inherited by him from his deceased father, Charles Fontelieu. Rehearing refused.