Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Van Horn v. Arantes, 40 So. 592.
- Leon Godchaux Clothing Co. v. Ruiz 179 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
- Randle v. Gallagher 169 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
- Aisene v. Gehbauer 70 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1954
- DH Holmes Co. v. Huth 49 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
- Mathews Furniture Co. v. La Bella 44 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
- Keller Zander, Inc. v. Copeland 196 So. 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
- Shannon v. Shannon 177 So. 676 La. 1937
-
D. H. Holmes Co. v. Morris
177 So. 417
La. 1937
The only law on which the plaintiff .bases the suit against Mr. Morris is the declaration in article 120 of the Civil Code, that the husband is obliged to receive the wife “and to furnish her with whatever is required for the convenience of life, in proportion to his means and condition.” Accordingly, , 40 So.
- Spring v. Mendoza 131 So. 299 La. 1930
-
L. Feibleman & Co. v. O'Rourke
124 So. 620
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Van Horn vs. Arantes, , 40 South.
-
Lopez v. Pampalone
8 La. App. 729
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Van Horn vs. Arantes, , 40 So.
- Schaeffer v. Trascher 115 So. 575 La. 1928
- Ducros v. Ducros 101 So. 407 La. 1924
- Rothstein v. Schimsky 74 So. 111 La. 1917