Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Geisenberger v. Cotton, 40 So. 929.
-
City of Baton Rouge v. Smuggy's Corp.
156 So. 3d 202
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
401, 410-411 , (1955); , 40 So.
-
Production Specialties, Inc. v. Century Oil Tool Co., Inc.
602 So. 2d 163
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
As observed in the Middleton Case, a belated answer to the petition was long ago held to constitute a waiver of abandonment, , 40 So.
- Middleton v. Middleton 526 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- Baker v. Wheless Drilling Co. 347 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
- Melancon v. Continental Casualty Company 307 So. 2d 308 La. 1975
- LeBlanc v. Thibodaux 162 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Overruled Green v. Small 79 So. 2d 497 La. 1955
-
State ex rel. Shields v. Southport Petroleum Corp. of Delaware
78 So. 2d 201
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Geisenberger v. Cotton, 1906, , 40 So.
- State v. United Dredging Co. 50 So. 2d 826 La. 1951
- Blanchard v. Smith 45 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
-
Metairie Bank in Liquidation v. Lecler
4 So. 2d 573
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Geisenberger v. Cotton, 1906, , 40 So.
-
Durr v. Winn
194 So. 63
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
“The transferree may nevertheless become possessed by the acceptance of the transfer by the debtor in an authentic act.” , 40 So.
- Schutzman v. Dobrowolski 186 So. 338 La. 1939
- Harrisonburg-Catahoula State Bank v. Meyers 185 So. 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
- Elgutter v. McCarty 167 So. 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
-
Hartman-Salmen Co. v. Maloney
156 So. 83
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Geisenberger v. Cotton (Litchenstein & Company), , 40 So.
-
Williams Gray v. Stewart
147 So. 103
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1933
sferree is only possessed, as it regards third persons, after notice has been given to the debtor of the transfer having taken place.” And article 2644 reads: “If, previous to notice having been given of the transfer to the debt or, either by the transferrer or by the transferee, the debtor should have made payment to the transferrer, the debtor is discharged of the debt.” , 40 So.
- King v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. 143 So. 95 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1932
-
Steele v. Hough
141 So. 22
La. 1932
702 , 704) cited; “It is the settled and unbending jurisprudence of this state that the assignment of an incorporeal right vests only an inchoate title, and that until notice to the debtor the assignor’s interest may be seized by his creditors.” *447 , 40 So.
- Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. J. M. Dresser Co. 131 So. 752 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1930
-
Spring v. Barr
120 So. 256
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Geisenberger vs. Catton Lichtenstein & Co., , 40 So.
- Continental Supply Co. v. Fisher Oil Co. 100 So. 64 La. 1924
- Lips v. Royal Ins. 89 So. 213 La. 1921
- Babin v. Lyons Lumber Co. 61 So. 855 La. 1913
- Succession of Waechter 59 So. 918 La. 1912