Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Girault v. Feucht, 41 So. 572.
- Toler v. Pacific Intern. Petroleum, Inc. 465 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- Choctaw Home Builders, Inc. v. Lena, Inc. 223 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- Arkansas Fuel Oil Corporation v. Maggio 141 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
- Huber v. Taussig 69 So. 2d 919 La. 1953
- Price v. Town of Ruston 139 So. 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Yates v. Batteford 139 So. 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
-
Salles v. Stafford, Derbes & Roy, Inc.
132 So. 140
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
The contract in this case was an agreement to sell, which as is well known, amounts to a sale in so far as to give "to either party a right to claim, recta via, the delivery of the thing.” , 41 So.
-
Middleton v. Natal
121 So. 681
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Girault vs. Feucht, , 41 South.
- McMillan v. Lorimer 107 So. 239 La. 1926
-
Babst v. Hartz
1 La. App. 498
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
"By a settled jurisprudence a promise of sale means no more than that the contract is susceptible of specific enforcement, , 41 South.
- Terrebonne v. Cheramie 92 So. 388 La. 1922
- Page v. Loeffler 84 So. 194 La. 1920
-
Pratt v. McCoy
54 So. 1012
La. 1911
That decree cannot be demanded as a matter of right.” True, , 41 South.
- Whited & Wheless, Ltd. v. Calhoun 47 So. 415 La. 1908
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. St. Louis Cypress Co. 46 So. 193 La. 1908
- Lehman v. Rice 43 So. 639 La. 1907