No. 15-KH-1566
Precedential
Processed
State ex rel. Hill v. State
State ex rel. Hill v. State, 201 So. 3d 883 (La. 2016).
Opinion text
PER CURIAM: | iDenied. The lower courts did not err. See La.R.S. 15:571.15. We attach hereto and make a part hereof the District Court’s written reasons denying relator’s application. Attachment *884 [[Image here]]