In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co.
In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co., 174 So. 140 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937).
Cited by
- Mossy Motors, Inc. v. Cameras America 851 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
- Ascension Builders, Inc. v. Jumonville 263 So. 2d 875 La. 1972
- Dodd v. Schell 207 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Francois v. Cloud 149 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
- Sustendal v. Weber 76 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
- Townley v. Pomes 194 So. 763 La. 1940
- Landreneau v. Perron 177 So. 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co. 181 La. 856
- In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co. 172 So. 48
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. Intervener, on March 1, 1933, deposited in Canal Bank & Trust Company a check for $100, for which his account was duly credited, the amount thereof being immediately made available to him. Thereafter, because of the events which are well known, the Canal Bank went into liquidation. He filed this suit seeking a preference, and in the civil district court judgment was rendered in his favor. The Canal Bank & Trust Company in liquidation has appealed. Counsel for both parties have filed with , us a statement agreeing that the legal issues presented are the same as those which were found in Re Canal Bank & Trust Company in Liquidation (intervention of John F. Clark & Co.), 181 La. 856 , 160 So. 609 , 99 A.L.R. 473 , and in that of In re Canal Bank & Trust Company in Liquidation (Intervention of Midio) (La.App.) 172 So. 48 , and that, therefore, the judgment appealed from should be reversed. Accordingly, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be, and it is, annulled, avoided, and reversed, and that the intervention of Chapman H. Hyams III be, and it is, hereby, dismissed at his cost. Reversed.