Genco v. Union Berry & Truck Ass'n
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 8, 1936 167 So. 890
Genco v. Union Berry & Truck Ass'n, 166 So. 888 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936).
Cited by
- Bannister v. Chisesi Longo 5 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
- Durrett Hardware & Furniture Co. v. Howze 174 So. 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
- Bryan v. Stirling 170 So. 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
- Genco v. Union Berry & Truck Ass'n 167 So. 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Daboval v. Daboval 3 La. 237
- Vacuum Oil Co. v. Cockrell 177 La. 623
- Gagneaux v. Desonier 104 La. 648
- 29 So. 282 not in our corpus
Opinion text
OTT, Judge. The ’suit is to recover $1,200 for salary during the year June 1, 1933, to June 1, 1934, at $100 per month, which plaintiff claims under a quantum meruit. The district court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff for $1,000, and maintained a sequestration of certain property belonging to defendant. We find in the record an order of appeal dated September 4, 1935, granting the defendant an appeal returnable to this court *889 on or before October 31, 1935, suspensive upon giving "bond in the sum required by law, and devolutive upon giving bond in the sum of $100. We have searched the record carefully, and fail to find any appeal bond in the record. Attached to the record is a certificate of the clerk of court certifying to its completeness. Until an appeal bond is filed there is no appeal, and the lower court is not divested of jurisdiction. The filing of an appeal bond is necessary to give the appellate court jurisdiction of the appeal. Daboval v. Daboval, 3 La. 237 ; Vacuum Oil Co. v. Cockrell, 177 La. 623 , 148 So. 898 . An order of appeal and an appeal bond are the very foundation of the appeal, and the absence of either is fatal to the appeal. The failure to file an appeal bond is jurisdictional, and the appellate court, in the absence of such a bond, will dismiss the appeal on its own motion. Louisiana State Bank v. David. N. Barrow et al., 24 La.Ann. 276 . See also Gagneaux v. Desonier, 104 La. 648 , 29 So. 282 . Section 9 of Act No. 112 of 1916 has no application where there has been no bond at all filed, but only prohibits the dismissal of an appeal on account of a defective or insufficient bond. For the reasons assigned, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed at the cost of appellant.