Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Theriot, 43 So. 265.

15 citing documents.

Pure Oil Company v. Skinner 294 So. 2d 797 La. 1974
649 , (1907); Zeringue v. Williams, 15 La.Ann.
Pure Oil Company v. Skinner 284 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
Richland Insurance Agency & Realty Co. v. Adams 185 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
649 , .” The statement above quoted was in itself .almost a literal repetition of the identical principle contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court in the Glover case.
Roy v. Elmer 153 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Vicknair v. Vicknair 29 So. 2d 706 La. 1947
Hutton v. Adkins 186 So. 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Witson v. Joseph 158 So. 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Ann. 169 , the court held that: “ * * * In the petitory action, the plaintiff must himself produce title; not a mere paper title, but a title which is traced back to an author who had in himself the right of property in the thing sold.” From Glover v. Haley et al., 118 La 649, , 266, we quote the following: ‘.The case is one in which the defendants being *665 in possession, in good faith, under a title translative of property, the plaintiff, in' or- • der to recover, must establish a perfect tit
Smith v. Chappell 148 So. 242 La. 1933
649 , ; Lowenburg, Marks & Co. v. H. & C. Newman, 142 La.
Gibson v. G. Dounson, Inc. 147 So. 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Capra v. Viola 135 So. 41 La. 1931
649 , ; City of New Orleans et al. v. Union Lumber Co., Ltd., 145 La.
Capra v. Viola 131 So. 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Landry v. T. Le Boeuf & Sons 95 So. 391 La. 1922
J. S. Terry Const. Co. v. James K. Sutherlin Co. 82 So. 384 La. 1919
Girod v. Monroe Brick Co. 52 So. 550 La. 1910
Succession of Theriot 45 So. 286 La. 1907