Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Robideaux v. Hebert, 43 So. 887.
- Henson v. Travelers Insurance Company 208 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Daves v. Hamilton 194 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
- Trapani v. Parish of Jefferson 180 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
-
Dowling v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York
168 So. 2d 107
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
Great American Indemnity Co. v. Fleniken, 134 F.2d 208 (C.A.La.); , 43 So.
- Crutti v. Frank 146 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
-
O'BRIEN v. Traders and General Insurance Company
136 So. 2d 852
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
[1089], 1090, 1095, , 12 L.R.A.
- Landry v. News-Star-World Pub. Corp. 46 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
- Lacaze v. Beeson 44 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
- De Cuers v. Crane Co. 40 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
-
Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. Standard Coffee Co.
2 So. 2d 89
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
[1089] 1090, 1095, , 12 L.R.A.(N.S.)
- Merritt v. E. L. Bruce Co. 166 So. 195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
- Hall v. Southern Advance Bag & Paper Co. 158 So. 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
- Crysel v. Gifford-Hill & Co. 158 So. 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
-
Dinet v. Orleans Dredging Co., Inc.
149 So. 126
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Counsel for the dredging company argue that the pile company was an independent contractor and, therefore, the general contractor is not responsible to third parties for the negligent act of the independent contractor, referring us to the following cases: , 43 So.
-
Norton v. Crescent City Ice Mfg. Co., Inc.
147 So. 385
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
We find, in addition to the views set forth in the cases cited in our original opinion, , 43 So.
-
Marquez v. Le Blanc
143 So. 108
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1932
1090 , 1095, , 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 632; Abate et al. v. Hirdes et al., 9 La.
- Beck v. Dubach Lumber Co. 131 So. 196 La. 1930
-
James v. Hillyer-Deutsch-Edwards, Inc.
130 So. 257
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
And if* the person employed reserves this power to himself, his relation to his employer is independent and he is a contractor; but if it is reserved to the employer or his agents the relation is that of master and servant.” , page 1095, 43 So.
- Johnson v. Vincennes Bridge Co. 118 So. 820 La. 1928
-
Johnson v. Vincennes Bridge Co.
119 So. 539
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
See Robideaux vs. Hebert et al., , 43 So.
-
Johnson v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.
5 La. App. 649
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
In Robichaux vs. Hebert, , 43 So.
- Helton v. Tall Timber Lumber Co. 86 So. 729 La. 1920
- Muldry v. Fromherz & Drennan 78 So. 126 La. 1917
- Clark v. Tall Timber Lumber Co. 73 So. 239 La. 1916
- Metzinger v. New Orleans Board of Trade, Ltd. 44 So. 1007 La. 1907