Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Damonte v. Patton, 48 So. 153.
- Holland v. Buckley 305 So. 2d 113 La. 1974
- Kennedy v. Frierson 142 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
-
Colomb v. McDonald
131 So. 2d 84
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
599 ; Damonte v. Patton, 1907, , 43 So.
-
Parker v. Young
122 So. 2d 699
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
599 ; Damonte v. Patton, 1907, , 43 So.
-
Briley v. Mitchell
110 So. 2d 169
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
599 ; Damonte v. Patton, 1907, , 43 So.
-
Harris v. Roy
108 So. 2d 7
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
599 ; Damonte v. Patton, 1907, , 43 So.
-
Ansardi v. Potter
71 So. 2d 347
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1954
599 ; Damonte v. Patton, 1907, , 43 So.
-
Alfred v. Lee
71 So. 2d 601
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
599 ; Damonte v. Patton, 1907, , 43 So.
- Stinson v. Robinson 68 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
-
Raziano v. TJ James & Co.
57 So. 2d 251
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
599 ; Damonte v. Patton, 1907, , 43 So.
- Hartman v. Aschaffenburg 12 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
- Law v. Osterland 3 So. 2d 680 La. 1941
-
Ellis v. Kolb
196 So. 89
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Failure of a plaintiff to anticipate the defendant’s negligence does not constitute contributory negligence.” See, also, , 40 So.
- Boudreau v. Louviere 178 So. 173 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1938
- Matthews v. Gremillion 174 So. 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
- Woulfe v. D'Antoni 158 So. 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
- Johnson v. Butterworth 157 So. 121 La. 1934
- Young v. Blaum 146 So. 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- Hamilton v. Lee 144 So. 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- McDonald v. Stellwagon 140 So. 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Demarco v. Gober 140 So. 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
-
Cloverland Dairy Products Co. v. Leach
134 So. 433
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
or .the damage he has caused; but if the animal had been lost, or had strayed more than a day, he may discharge himself from this responsibility, by abandoning him to the person who has sustained the injury; except where the master has turned loose a dangerous or noxious animal, for then he must pay for all the harm done, without being allowed to make the abandonment,” , 43 So.
-
Salvant v. Estate of Frank Newfield, Inc.
128 So. 320
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Damonte vs. Patton, , 43 So.
-
Washington v. Y. & M. V. R. R.
124 So. 631
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
370 ; Damonte vs. Patton, , 43 So.
-
Manuel v. Young
119 So. 555
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Damonte vs. Patton, , 43 So.
-
Palmetto Fire Insurance v. Clarke Garage Co.
6 La. App. 420
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Damonte vs. Patton, , 43 South.
- Dean v. Burglass 81 So. 330 La. 1919
-
Rouseo v. Gauche-Connor Co.
8 Teiss. 216
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1911
In Damonte vs. Patton, , the court, with ordinance just cited before it, held: “It is negligence for the driver of a horse and cart to abandon his seat and hold on the reins.
- Ford v. Tremont Lumber Co. 49 So. 492 La. 1909
-
Karstendiek v. Jackson Brewing Co.
48 So. 958
La. 1909
The following are cases in point: , 43 South.