Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smith v. Hussey, 43 So. 902.

15 citing documents.

Day v. Lide 304 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Hymel v. Old Homestead Inc. 135 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
Noto v. Blasco 198 So. 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Buckman v. Stafford, Derbes & Roy, Inc. 119 So. 701 La. 1929
Breaux v. Burkenstock 115 So. 482 La. 1928
Millaudon v. Brenan 5 La. App. 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
478 ; Smith vs. Heissey, , 43 So.
Fowler v. Phillips 106 So. 26 La. 1925
Sizeler v. Cloney 2 La. App. 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
tained only by a consideration of all the facts in connection with the agreement of the parties.” And in Sonneman vs. Cutter, 10 Orleans App. 158, this court said: “Whether or not money deposited by a purchaser is ‘earnest money’, is a question of fact dependent upon the intention of the parties to be deduced from a consideration of all the facts surrounding their agreement.” In Smith vs. Hussey, , 43 South.
Baton Rouge Investment & Realty Co. v. Bailey 103 So. 184 La. 1925
82 , , as supporting the claim, but we do not think the case analogous to the facts of this case.
Bermuda Stock Farms Co. v. Gilliland Oil Co. 99 So. 708 La. 1924
To constitute an agreement of sale *954 with the giving of earnest, under the provisions of article 2463 of the Civil Code, it is, of course, not necessaryi that the money given as earnest should be called “earnest.” , 43 South.
Terrebonne v. Cheramie 92 So. 388 La. 1922
Northcut v. Johnson 78 So. 731 La. 1918
478 ; Smith v. Hussey, *455 , 43 South.
Maloney v. Aschaffenburg 78 So. 761 La. 1917
Lyons v. Woman's League 50 So. 18 La. 1909
14, p. 115; Smith v. Hussey, *239 , 43 South.
Legier v. Braughn 49 So. 22 La. 1909