Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dinkelspiel v. Pons, 43 So. 1018.

16 citing documents.

  • James, Robinson, Felts & Starnes v. Powell 303 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    See Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
  • McGovern v. Gilbert 127 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Dinkelspiel & Hart v. Pons, 1907, , 43 So.
  • Mayer v. Ozenne 87 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
  • Peiser v. Grand Isle, Inc. 69 So. 2d 51 La. 1953
    839 ; Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
  • Dane & Northrop v. Selzer 63 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    In Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
  • Jackson v. New Orleans Board of Trade, Ltd. 21 So. 2d 731 La. 1945
    They were reimbursed $138 for the costs of mortgage and conveyance certificates, tax researches, etc. In Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
  • Succession of Weil 17 So. 2d 255 La. 1944
    326 ; Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
  • Conner v. Harper 2 So. 2d 177 La. 1941
    70 ; Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
  • Succession of Robinson 178 So. 337 La. 1937
    517, 521 , Chief Justice Eustis said : “ ‘The responsibility of determining the amount of fees for professional services is a matter of great delicacy; and under the rules on which our predecessors and the profession have acted for years, a court in fixing them in a case of this kind must be guided by a conscientious estimate of their value.’ “In the case of Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
  • Succession of Wood 171 So. 843 La. 1937
    The court said, in the case of Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
  • Peltier v. Thibodaux 144 So. 903 La. 1932
    In the case of Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
  • Sigrest v. Federal Insurance 129 So. 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
    Reference was also made by the Chief Justice to the Dinkelspiel & Hart vs. Pons, , 43 So.
  • Block v. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance 7 La. App. 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
    Dinkelspiel and Hart vs. Pons, , 43 So.
  • Titche v. Hiller 5 La. App. 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
    326 ; Dinkelspiel & Hart vs. Pons, , 43 South.
  • Woodville v. Thomas 3 La. App. 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
    505 ; Dinkelspiel vs. Pons, , 43 South.
  • Hunt v. Hill 70 So. 522 La. 1915
    The latest expression applicable- to the question of admissibility of such testimony is a quotation in Bank v. Sinnot, supra, from a former decision, to the effect that, in estimating attorney’s fees, the court must exercise its own judgment, guided, but not controlled, by the expert testimony of lawyers; or, as was said in Dinkelspiel & , 43 South.