DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Glain v. Sparandeo, 44 So. 120.

15 citing documents.

  • Johnson v. St. Francis Medical Center, Inc. 521 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    In the Connors case the court held that “the security for costs may be filed at any time prior to the order of dismissal.” , 44 So.
  • Wexler v. Occhipinti 378 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
  • Krennerich v. WCG Investment Corporation 278 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    Defendant urges that the railing had been misused and abused during the party; that the rail was not designed to allow tenants or guests to sit or lean on it; , 44 So.
  • Montgomery v. Cantelli 174 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
  • Bates v. Blitz 17 So. 2d 816 La. 1944
    used even in case it should appear he knew nothing of the existence of such vices and defects, at the time the lease was made, and even if they have arisen since, provided they do not arise from the fault of the lessee; and if any loss should result to the lessee from the vices and defects, the lessor shall be bound to indemnify him for the same,” and, , 44 So.
  • Bates v. Blitz 13 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
  • Mosher v. Burglass 170 So. 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
    sult from abnormal and unexpected use of such portions of his building as rails, stairways, galleries, et *418 cetera, which, although they may be entirely safe if used in the manner in which the lessor is justified in assuming that they will be used, are entirely unsafe if.subjected to unreasonable and extraordinary stress or strain.” To the same effect, the Supreme Court, , 44 So.
  • Estes v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co. 157 So. 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
  • Brown v. Pons 147 So. 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    In Evans v. Hollander, supra, relied on by plaintiff, we find that this court, in laying down a rule which should be applied in determining whether a lessor is liable, said that recovery should be limited to the cases in which the allegedly defective portion of the property broke “while being used in the manner intended by its erection.” , 44 So.
  • Caulfield v. Saba 144 So. 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
  • Thompson v. Moran 140 So. 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
  • Collins Piano Co. v. Ziegeler 138 So. 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
  • Connors v. Turney 126 So. 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
    We think that the discussion in the case of Glain vs. Sparandeo, , 44 So.
  • Gardiner v. Erskine 127 So. 604 La. 1929
  • Marsh v. Avegno 3 La. App. 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
    222 ; Glain vs. Sparandeo, , 44 South.