Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Zacharie, 43 So. 988.
- Succession of Carolyn Gauthier Bargeman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
-
In re Dauterive
251 So. 3d 1204
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
The issue of delivery of funds was addressed in , 43 So.
- Purcell v. Purcell 697 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- Succession of Young 563 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Allbritton v. Allbritton 561 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- Dance v. Dance 552 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
-
Succession of Daroca
536 So. 2d 466
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
little weight ...” , 43 So.
- Butler v. Reddick 431 So. 2d 396 La. 1983
- Bergeron v. Bergeron 411 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
-
Succession of Miller
405 So. 2d 812
La. 1981
Delivery was again an issue in , 43 So.
- TL James & Co., Inc. v. Montgomery 308 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
- Allen v. Allen 301 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
-
Succession of Grubbs
170 So. 2d 256
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
Cited as authority for this argument is , 43 So.
-
Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage & Water Board
168 So. 2d 595
La. 1964
149 , and Wilson v. Calvin, 221 La.
-
Bennett v. Markley
138 So. 2d 169
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
However, the counsel for defendant did cite the following cases and codal articles in support of his contention that “the burden of proof rests upon the one claiming the donation.” , 43 So.
- Lamkin v. Hanna 135 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
-
Succession of McCrocklin
126 So. 2d 364
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
195 ; Succession of Zacharie, 1907, , 43 So.
- Odom v. Odom 121 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
- Succession of Bendel 116 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
- Funderburk v. Funderburk 38 So. 2d 502 La. 1949
- Succession of Gorman. 26 So. 2d 150 La. 1946
- Succession of Byrnes 20 So. 2d 301 La. 1944
-
Ory Bros. v. Muller
128 So. 903
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
In Succession óf Zacharie, , 43 S.o.
- Gibson v. Hearn 113 So. 766 La. 1927