Jackson v. Crillton
Jackson v. Crillton, 46 So. 101 (La. 1908).
Cited by
- Hebert v. Hollier 976 So. 2d 1256 La. 2007
- Hearne v. Miller 138 So. 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
- Gamet's Estate v. Lindner 106 So. 22 La. 1925
- Davenport v. Sterling Lumber Co. 79 So. 215 La. 1918
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State ex rel. Taylor v. Judge of the Superior District Court 26 La. Ann. 65
- State ex rel. Des Allemands Lumber Co. v. Allen 110 La. 853
- Ramos Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. Sanders 112 La. 614
Opinion text
MONROE, J. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying her the right to bond a judicial sequestration of the real estate herein sought to be partitioned; more than 10 days having elapsed from the date of the sequestration, and the defendants having made no effort to exercise that right. This court has held that the concluding paragraph of Code Prac. art. 274, reading: “In such cases, sequestration [referring to the judicial sequestration of real property] may be ordered to continue until the question of ownership shall have been decided” — is governed by the provisions of Code Prac. art. 279, which authorizes the bonding of any sequestration, save in cases of failure. State ex rel. Taylor v. Judge, 26 La. Ann. 65 ; State ex rel. Des Allemands Lumber Co. v. Judge, 110 La. 853 , 34 South. 804 ; Ramos Lumber Co. v. Sanders, 112 La. 614 , 36 South. 625 . It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be annulled and reversed, and the case remanded to the district court, to be there proceeded with according to law and to the views herein expressed; the defendant (appellee) to pay the costs of the appeal.