Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lynch v. Knoop, 43 So. 252.

42 citing documents.

Tenneco Oil Co. v. Hines 535 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Moore v. Thunderbird, Inc. 331 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Warren v. Richard 296 So. 2d 813 La. 1974
Rogers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 261 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Faia v. Landry 249 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Chatman v. Martin 245 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
Brown v. City of Alexandria 225 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Although Michael was of sufficient age to be barred from recovery by the doctrine of contributory negligence, , 43 So.
Miles v. CITY-PARISH GOVT. OF EAST BATON ROUGE PAR. 219 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(4th La.App., 1962, rehearing and writs denied); Cheeks v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, , 43 So.
White v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. Ltd. 210 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Strogens v. Small 209 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Levy v. State 192 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Abraham v. Connecticut Fire Insurance 177 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Kimball v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 161 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
403 , ), although a child of eight years and over may be old enough to fall within the rule of contributory negligence ( , 43 So.
Scott v. La Fontaine 148 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Cheeks v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, La.App., ; , 43 So.
Danna v. London Guarantee & Accident Company 147 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Buie v. Hester 147 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
The denominations of classes of relationships as provided in Article 2315 have been restricted to legitimate relatives; , 43 So.
Floor-N-Wall Distributors, Inc. v. Chartres Co. 144 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Juhas v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pa. 140 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Cheeks v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 87 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
The universal and most effectual way of discovering the true meaning of a law, when its expressions are dubious, is by considering the reason and spirit of it, or the cause which induced the Legislature to enact it.” , 43 So.
Stamps v. Henderson 25 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Thompson v. Vestal Lumber & Mfg. Co. 22 So. 2d 842 La. 1944
Thompson v. Vestal Lumber Mfg. Co. 16 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
This holding is supported by: , 43 So.
Douga v. Ancona Baking Co. 193 So. 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Scott v. Brown Paper Mill Co. 174 So. 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Walker v. Rose Hill Amusement Co. 167 So. 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Vallery v. Teche Lines, Inc. 166 So. 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Kahn v. Shreveport Railways Co. 161 So. 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Middleton v. Humble 154 So. 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Marquette v. Cangelosi 148 So. 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
page 618, , 8 L. R. A. (N. S.) 480, 118 Am.
Brown v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 138 So. 221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1931
Spillman v. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. 135 So. 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Hargus v. N. O. Public Service, Inc. 118 So. 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
“A bright and intelligent child eight years old is.sui juris so far as negligence is concerned.” Lynch vs. Knoop, , 43 So.
Ford v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 8 La. App. 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
52 ; Lynch vs. Knoop, , 43 South.
Murphy v. N. O. Public Service 7 La. App. 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
729 ; Lynch vs. Knoop, , 43 South.
Moulin v. Monteleone 115 So. 447 La. 1927
Ainsworth v. Murphy 5 La. App. 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
1004 , 38 South 810 ; Lynch vs. Knoop, .
Kerner v. Trans-Mississippi Terminal R. Co. 104 So. 740 La. 1925
Youchican v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 86 So. 551 La. 1920
Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Vatter 14 Teiss. 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1917
Green v. New Orleans, S. & G. I. R. 74 So. 717 La. 1917
Flash v. Louisiana Western R. 68 So. 636 La. 1915
Mount v. Tremont Lumber Co. 46 So. 103 La. 1908