Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. Angelloz, 43 So. 529.
-
Roberson v. Chance
182 So. 3d 203
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Ryan v. Lee, supra, , 43 So.
- Ryan v. Lee 870 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- Richardson & Bass v. Board of Levee Commissioners 77 So. 2d 32 La. 1954
- Pierce v. Hunter 13 So. 2d 259 La. 1943
- Buckley v. Catlett 13 So. 2d 384 La. 1943
-
Hunter v. Forrest
197 So. 649
La. 1940
â– Hanson Lumber *980 , 43 So.
- McCluskey v. Meraux & Nunez, Inc. 188 So. 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1939
-
Continental Land & Fur Co. v. Lacoste
188 So. 700
La. 1939
Albert Hanson *569 , 43 So.
- Smith v. King 188 So. 25 La. 1939
-
Bruce v. Holstein
151 So. 810
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1934
' A leading case on the subject, referred to in practically all subsequent cases involving the same question, is Albert Hanson Lumber Company v. Angelloz, et al., , 43 So.
- Dalbey v. Continental Supply Co. 115 So. 807 La. 1928
- Matthews v. Olla State Bank 114 So. 98 La. 1927
-
Bayard v. Baldwin Lumber Co.
103 So. 290
La. 1925
862 , ; Bendernagel v. Foret, 145 La.
- Harang v. Gheens Realty Co. 98 So. 760 La. 1923
-
McHugh v. Albert Hanson Lumber Co.
82 So. 392
La. 1919
For one of the requisites of the prescription of 10 years is a title translative of the property ( , 43 South.
- Bendernagel v. Foret 81 So. 869 La. 1919
- Haas v. Fontenot 61 So. 831 La. 1913
-
Schwann v. Sanders
46 So. 573
La. 1908
PROVOSTY, J. The suit of Albert Hanson Lumber Co., Ltd., v. Emile Angelloz et al., , 43 South.