Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Romero, 42 So. 482.
- State v. Tullos 182 So. 321 La. 1938
- State v. Green 168 So. 766 La. 1936
- State v. Patterson 147 So. 62 La. 1932
- State v. Dreher 118 So. 85 La. 1928
- State v. Mischiro 115 So. 909 La. 1928
-
Brown v. King
7 La. App. 546
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
406 , the court said: “It is inadmissible, in order to attack veracity, to prove the character of a female witness for chastity, or to show that she is a prostitute.” And in State vs. Romero, , 42 So.
- State v. Williams 109 So. 515 La. 1926
- State v. Cole 109 So. 505 La. 1926
- State v. Green 106 So. 701 La. 1925
- State v. Johnson 101 So. 250 La. 1924
- State v. Normandale 97 So. 798 La. 1923
- State v. Vial 96 So. 796 La. 1923
- State v. Gibbs 95 So. 716 La. 1923
- State v. Huff 80 So. 551 La. 1918
- State v. Johnson 75 So. 678 La. 1917
- State v. Smith 50 So. 842 La. 1909