DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cristadoro v. Von Behren's Heirs, 44 So. 852.

21 citing documents.

  • Billiot v. State 654 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Cristadoro v. Von Behren’s Heirs, , 44 So.
  • Fonseca v. Marlin Marine Corp. 410 So. 2d 674 La. 1981
  • Olsen v. Shell Oil Co. 365 So. 2d 1285 La. 1978
  • Lanclos v. Tomlinson 351 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • Malatesta v. Lowry 130 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    768 ; Allain v. Frigola, supra; Wise v. Lavigne, supra; , 44 So.
  • Gaida v. Hourgettes 67 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    As to a person other than the wife the scope of the article was so extended in Cristadoro v. Von Behren['s Heirs], , 44 So.
  • Lowe v. Home Owners' Loan Corporation 1 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    v. Von Behren's Heirs et al., , 44 So.
  • Duplain v. Wiltz 194 So. 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    148 ; Cristadoro v. Von Behren’s Heirs, , 44 So.
  • Mills v. Heidingsfield 192 So. 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    The provisions of article 2322 constitute an application of the principle enun *789 ciated in Civil Code article 2316 that, ■“Every person is responsible for the damage he occasions not merely by his act, but by his negligence, his imprudence, or his want of skill” (Cristadoro v. Von Behren’s Heirs, , 44 So.
  • Tesoro v. Abate 173 So. 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    See Cristadora v. Von Behren’s Heirs, , 44 So.
  • Richard v. Tarantino 131 So. 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
    148 ; Cristadoro v. Von Behren’s Heirs, , 44 So.
  • Stevens v. Illinois Cent. R. R. 6 La. App. 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
    1028 , ; Gray vs. Foundation Company, 151 La.
  • Klein v. Young 111 So. 495 La. 1926
    This we understand to be still the law, repeatedly recognized in the following decisions: Cristadoro v. Von Behren’s Heirs, , 44 So.
  • Gallman v. Young 3 La. App. 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
    This we understand to be still the law, repeatedly recognized in the following decisions: Cristadora vs. Von Behren’s Heirs, , 44 South.
  • Shelton v. Masur 102 So. 813 La. 1925
    1028 , , 17 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1161.” The doctrine of 'the decision in Boutte v. New Orleans Terminal Co., as expressed in two paragraphs of the syllabus, is especially pertinent to the present case, viz.: “The jurisprudence to the effect that a lessee cannot knowingly and intentionally permit an injury to occur from the need
  • Davis v. Hochfelder 95 So. 598 La. 1923
  • Ciaccio v. Carbajal 83 So. 73 La. 1919
    It may be that the occupants of the building, by reason of the character of their occupancy, may have come under some obligations as to the condition of the premises'from which strangers are absolutely freed; but, if the occupants have complied with those obligations, the lessor is responsible for personal injuries received by them.” In Christadoro v. Von Behren’s Heirs et al., , 44 South.
  • Badie v. Columbia Brewing Co. 77 So. 768 La. 1918
    322 ; Cristadoro v. Von Behren’s Heirs, , 44 South.
  • Ciaccio v. Carbajal 76 So. 583 La. 1917
  • Allain v. Frigola 74 So. 404 La. 1917
    322 ; Cristadoro v. Von Behren’s Heirs, , 44 South.
  • Distinguished Baucum v. Pine Woods Lumber Co. 57 So. 577 La. 1912