Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dinkelspiel v. Pons, 43 So. 1018.
-
James, Robinson, Felts & Starnes v. Powell
303 So. 2d 229
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
See Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
-
McGovern v. Gilbert
127 So. 2d 93
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Dinkelspiel & Hart v. Pons, 1907, , 43 So.
- Mayer v. Ozenne 87 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
-
Peiser v. Grand Isle, Inc.
69 So. 2d 51
La. 1953
839 ; Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
-
Dane & Northrop v. Selzer
63 So. 2d 760
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
In Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
-
Jackson v. New Orleans Board of Trade, Ltd.
21 So. 2d 731
La. 1945
They were reimbursed $138 for the costs of mortgage and conveyance certificates, tax researches, etc. In Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
-
Succession of Weil
17 So. 2d 255
La. 1944
326 ; Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
-
Conner v. Harper
2 So. 2d 177
La. 1941
70 ; Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
-
Succession of Robinson
178 So. 337
La. 1937
517, 521 , Chief Justice Eustis said : “ ‘The responsibility of determining the amount of fees for professional services is a matter of great delicacy; and under the rules on which our predecessors and the profession have acted for years, a court in fixing them in a case of this kind must be guided by a conscientious estimate of their value.’ “In the case of Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
-
Succession of Wood
171 So. 843
La. 1937
The court said, in the case of Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
-
Peltier v. Thibodaux
144 So. 903
La. 1932
In the case of Dinkelspiel & , 43 So.
-
Sigrest v. Federal Insurance
129 So. 379
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Reference was also made by the Chief Justice to the Dinkelspiel & Hart vs. Pons, , 43 So.
-
Block v. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance
7 La. App. 20
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Dinkelspiel and Hart vs. Pons, , 43 So.
-
Titche v. Hiller
5 La. App. 375
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
326 ; Dinkelspiel & Hart vs. Pons, , 43 South.
-
Woodville v. Thomas
3 La. App. 266
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
505 ; Dinkelspiel vs. Pons, , 43 South.
-
Hunt v. Hill
70 So. 522
La. 1915
The latest expression applicable- to the question of admissibility of such testimony is a quotation in Bank v. Sinnot, supra, from a former decision, to the effect that, in estimating attorney’s fees, the court must exercise its own judgment, guided, but not controlled, by the expert testimony of lawyers; or, as was said in Dinkelspiel & , 43 South.