Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vaughan v. Dalton-Lard Lumber Co., 43 So. 926.

33 citing documents.

Arnold Lyle Lewis, Ind. Admin of Succession of Rosalie Hardy Lewis and John Charles Lewis v. Harbor Freight … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
The law governing survival and wrongful death actions provides for “a distinct right of action, in favor of certain classes of persons.” 43 So.
KHRISTY GOINS RISMILLER, TUTRIX FOR DANIEL EDWARDS GOINS VERSUS GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY Consolidated With DAVID WATTS VERSUS MARK … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Nathan v. Touro Infirmary 501 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
We specifically overrule Vaughan v. Dalton-Lard Lumber Co., [ , 43 So.
King v. Cancienne 316 So. 2d 366 La. 1975
King v. Cancienne 303 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
The trial court found plaintiff to be in good faith and thus a putative spouse within the purview of Civil Code Articles 117 and 118; however, , 43 So.
Cortes v. Fleming 267 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Rogers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 261 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Chatman v. Martin 245 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
1016 , 11 L.R.A., N.S., 387; , 43 So.
Levy v. State ex rel. Charity Hospital of Louisiana at New Orleans Board of Administrators 216 So. 2d 818 La. 1968
Levy v. State, Char. Hosp. of La. at N. Orleans Bd. of Ad. 216 So. 2d 818 La. 1968
Abraham v. Connecticut Fire Insurance 177 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Vaughan v. Dalton-Lard Company, Ltd., et al., , 43 So.
Buie v. Hester 147 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Prior to the amendment of 1960, , 43 So.
Finn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION 141 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Jackson v. Lindlom 84 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Harris v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. 48 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Vaughn v. Dalton-Lard Lumber Co., Limited et al., , 43 So.
Strickland v. Globe Indemnity Co. 42 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Navarrette v. Joseph Laughlin, Inc. 20 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
We say "legal spouse and child" because the Supreme Court has already determined that a putative wife is not the widow or wife of a person within the purview of Article 2315 ( , 43 So.
Thompson v. Vestal Lumber Mfg. Co. 16 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Vaughan v. Dalton-Lard Lumber Co., Ltd., et al., , 43 So.
Vallery v. Teche Lines, Inc. 166 So. 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills v. Fernandez 159 So. 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Code, art. 2315, the term “widow”, has been strictly construed and is now held as not including a “putative widow.” ’ , 43 So.
Brown v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 138 So. 221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1931
Spillman v. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. 135 So. 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Reed v. Warren 132 So. 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Gibbs v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. 125 So. 445 La. 1929
62 , , inconsistent with the .rulings in the cases cited supra.
Bradley v. Swift & Co. 119 So. 37 La. 1928
Vaughan v. Dalton-Land Lumber Co., Limited, , 43 So.
Moulin v. Monteleone 115 So. 447 La. 1927
1016 , 11 L. R. A. (N. S.) 387; , 43 So.
Stephenson v. N. O. Ry. & L. Co. 7 La. App. 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
64 , ; Chivers vs. Roger, 50 La.
Kruse v. Pavlovich 6 La. App. 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
In Vaughan vs. Dalton-Lard Lumber Co., , 43 So.
Kerner v. Trans-Mississippi Terminal R. Co. 104 So. 740 La. 1925
1016 , 11 L. R. A. (N. S.) 387; , 43 So.
Jones v. Powell Lumber Co. 101 So. 135 La. 1924
eless its civil effects as it *770 relates to the parties and their children, if it has been contracted in good faith.” Article 118 declares: “If only one of the parties acted in good faith, the marriage produces its civil effects only in his or her favor and in favor of the children born from the marriage.” , 43 South.
Green v. New Orleans, S. & G. I. R. 74 So. 717 La. 1917
Flash v. Louisiana Western R. 68 So. 636 La. 1915
Mount v. Tremont Lumber Co. 46 So. 103 La. 1908