Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Easley, 43 So. 279.

16 citing documents.

State v. Carite 155 So. 2d 21 La. 1963
State v. Alleman 51 So. 2d 83 La. 1950
State v. Anderson 20 So. 2d 288 La. 1944
State v. Broussard 12 So. 2d 218 La. 1942
State v. Disotell 158 So. 825 La. 1934
State v. Taylor 133 So. 349 La. 1931
“Except in extreme cases, the presumption is that the prejudicial effect on the jury of improper remarks made by counsel for the state was removed by the instructions of the court to the jury to disregard the same.” , 43 So.
State v. Delombre 110 So. 336 La. 1926
State v. Reed 109 So. 414 La. 1926
“Except in extreme eases the presumption is that the prejudicial effect on the jury of improper remarks made by counsel for the state was removed by the instructions of the court to the jury to disregard the same.” , 43 So.
State v. Cole 109 So. 505 La. 1926
State v. Jarrow 103 So. 390 La. 1925
State v. Minor 97 So. 873 La. 1923
State v. Perry 90 So. 406 La. 1921
State v. Robertson 63 So. 363 La. 1913
In re Oliphant 61 So. 533 La. 1913
The French commentators on the corresponding article of the Code Napoleon (article 394) are divided in opinion.” , 43 South.
State v. High 47 So. 878 La. 1908
State v. Heidelberg 45 So. 256 La. 1907