Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. Board of Assessors, 47 So. 415.
- Toler v. Pacific Intern. Petroleum, Inc. 465 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- D'Arbonne Sewerage, Inc. v. Sanders 259 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
-
Arkansas Fuel Oil Corporation v. Maggio
141 So. 2d 516
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
100 , , it was contended that an agreement was null because the plaintiff did not bind himself absolutely to take the property, but left it within his power to withdraw from the agreement if title was not "satisfactory."
-
Huber v. Taussig
69 So. 2d 919
La. 1953
100 , ; Salles v. Stafford, Derbes & Roy, Inc., 173 La.
-
Thompson v. Thompson
30 So. 2d 321
La. 1947
100 , and Kinberger v. Drouet, 149 La.
-
Hardtner v. Dixie Oil Co.
113 So. 357
La. 1927
page 100, , and likewise a citation to Hollingsworth v. Colthurst, 78 Kan.
- Bemis Bro. Bag Co. v. Louisiana Tax Commission 103 So. 337 La. 1925
- Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Board of Assessors 59 So. 906 La. 1912
- Lisso & Bro. v. Police Jury 53 So. 566 La. 1910
-
Saint v. Martel
53 So. 432
La. 1910
Beyond that, when this court reversed the judgment of the trial court, and overruled the exception, it said “the case was not decided on the merits, and therefore must be remanded,” and it was “remanded for further proceedings according to law.” , 47 South.
- Labarre v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co. 53 So. 113 La. 1910
-
Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. v. Fitzpatrick
52 So. 118
La. 1910
PROYOSTY, J. This court has frequently had occasion to announce that: “A reduction of assessment cannot be decreed in a suit which is distinctly and exclusively for cancellation.” , 47 South.
- Orient Ins. v. Board of Assessors 50 So. 778 La. 1909