Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 45 So. 415.
-
State v. Campbell
171 So. 3d 1176
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Rebuttal evidence is “ ‘evidence which has become relevant or important only as an effect of some evidence introduced by the other side.’ ” ( , 45 So.
-
State v. Hatfield
155 So. 3d 572
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Rebuttal evidence is “evidence which has become relevant or important only as an effect of some evidence introduced by the other side.” Turner, 337 So.2d at 458 ( , 45 So.
- State v. Shipp 712 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
- State v. Amato 698 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- State v. Deboue 552 So. 2d 355 La. 1989
- Combs v. Hartford Ins. Co. 544 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Caldwell
493 So. 2d 749
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Again, , 45 So.
- State v. Thibodeaux 473 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Dayton 445 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Perry 408 So. 2d 1358 La. 1982
- State v. Gatlin 396 So. 2d 1294 La. 1981
- State v. Hills 354 So. 2d 186 La. 1978
- State v. Alexander 351 So. 2d 505 La. 1977
-
State v. Turner
337 So. 2d 455
La. 1976
Again, in State v. Smith , 45 So.
- State v. Iseringhausen 16 So. 2d 65 La. 1943
- State v. King 147 So. 1 La. 1933
- State v. Hidalgo 120 So. 31 La. 1929