Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gary v. Brenholz, 46 So. 12.

13 citing documents.

Whipple v. Smith 428 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Little v. Little 371 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
State Ex Rel. Loraine, Inc. v. Adjustment Board of City of Baton Rouge 57 So. 2d 409 La. 1952
1028 , ; Clement v. Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana, 173 La.
Foret v. Stark 16 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
1028 , , it was held that there is no right to maintain a proceeding by rule in which the plaintiff alleges that the defendant is wrongfully in possession of the former's property and prays that he be ordered to show cause why a writ of possession should not issue.
State Ex Rel. Hymel's Heirs v. Johness, Inc. 198 So. 890 La. 1940
1028 , ; Calcasieu Building & Loan Association v. Goudeau, 182 La.
Younger Bros. v. Spell 193 So. 354 La. 1939
1028 , ; Succession of Esteves, 182 La.
Dunlap v. Ramsey & Dunlap 184 So. 710 La. 1938
1028 , , it was held that the right to initiate an original judicial proceeding by rule or summary procedure must be expressly authorized by statute.
Succession of Shelley 180 So. 452 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1938
Southern Coal Co. v. Thibodaux Chauvin 181 So. 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
1028 , ; Succession of Jamison, 108 La.
Succession of Esteves 162 So. 194 La. 1935
1028 , ; *607 Succession of Townsend, 37 La.
Calcasieu Building & Loan Ass'n v. Goudeau 161 So. 599 La. 1935
1028 , ; Louisiana Digest, verbo “Obligations,” § 134; State ex rel.
Clement v. Gulf Refining Co. 136 So. 581 La. 1931
1028 , , it was held that the right to initiate an original judicial proceeding by rule to show cause “implies the pendency of a suit between the parties and is confined to incidental matters which may arise in the progress of a contestation, except, in certain cases, where a summary proceeding is expressly allowed by la
Barrett v. Pierson 112 So. 410 La. 1927
1028 , ; State v. Jackson & Company, 145 La.