No. 16-KP-2199
Precedential
Processed
State ex rel. Reeves v. Vannoy
State ex rel. Reeves v. Vannoy, 209 So. 3d 87 (La. 2017).
Cited by
- State v. Reeves 254 So. 3d 665 La. 2018
- State ex rel. Lane v. State 214 So. 3d 842 La. 2017
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Campbell v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 642 So. 2d 1273
- State v. Reeves 188 So. 3d 257
Opinion text
PER CURIAM: h Denied. Relator shows no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision to deny his request to further supplement his application for post-conviction relief. See State ex rel. Duhon v. Whitley, 92-1740 (La. 9/2/94), 642 So.2d 1273 (district court has discretion to decide whether to allow a post-conviction petitioner to amend or supplement a timely-filed application for post-conviction relief); cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(E). Within 90 days of this order, the district court is ordered to rule on all of relator’s now pending claims. See State v. Reeves, 15-1668 (La. 4/4/16), 188 So.3d 257 .