DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hill v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 170 So. 45.

16 citing documents.

  • McCauley v. Manda Brothers Provisions Co. 202 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Freeman v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 179 So.
  • Love v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 175 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    * % # * - sjc # “In following the views expressed in Hill v. Louisiana Coca Cola Bottling Co. [La.App., ] and Dye v. American Beverage Co., [La.App., 194 So.
  • Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 97 So. 2d 389 La. 1957
    App., ; McLehan v. Loft Candy Stores, La.App., 172 So.
  • Morrow v. Bunkie Coca Cola Bottling Co. 84 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    245 ; Hill v. Louisiana Coca Cola Bottling Co., 1936, La.App,, ; MacLehan v. Loft Candy Stores, Inc., 1937, La.App., 172 So.
  • Gray v. Morgan & Lindsey, Inc. 55 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    909 ; Hill v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company, La.App., ; Freeman v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Ltd., La.App., 179 So.
  • Nichols v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 46 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    We have many times said (see Hill v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., *699 La.App., Russo v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., 161 So.
  • Matthews v. New Orleans Terminal Co. 45 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    662 ; Thrash v. Continental Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hill v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., ; Cimo v. Karstendiek, La.App., 173 So.
  • Mayerhefer v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 45 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    438, 440 , this Court, through Judge McCaleb, observed that: *445 "We have many times said (see Hill v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., , Russo v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., 161 So.
  • Basile v. World Bottling Co. 17 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    See also Hill v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., ; Freeman v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., 179 So.
  • Jenkins v. Bogalusa Coca Cola Bottling Co. 1 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    909 ; Hill v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., .
  • Hollis v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 196 So. 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    909 ; Hill v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., ; and Freeman v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., 179 So.
  • Dye v. American Beverage Co. 194 So. 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    We have many times said (see Hill v. Louisiana Coco-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., , Russo v. Louisiana Coco-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., 161 So.
  • Comforto v. Cloverland Dairy Products Co. 194 So. 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    621 , Hill v. Louisiana Bottling Co., La.App., , and Russo v. Louisiana Coca Cola Bottling Co., La.App., 161 So.
  • Kohlman v. Jefferson Bottling Co. 192 So. 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    We have con-' sidered a number of similar cases (Russo v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company, supra; Hill v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company, La.App., ; Von Herr v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company, La.App., 148 So.
  • Auzenne v. Gulf Public Service Co. 181 So. 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    See Hill v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company, La.App., , and cases there cited.
  • Freeman v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 179 So. 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    Counsel for plaintiff maintains that the trial judge decided this matter solely upon a .