Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lindstrom v. Sauer, 166 So. 636.

21 citing documents.

Distinguished Wied v. TRCM, LLC 698 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Barnett v. Jabusch 607 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
BYLES WELDING AND TRACTOR CO. v. Butts Sales and Service, Inc. 541 So. 2d 992 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
the personal wrongdoings of the sole shareholder was the basis for finding personal liability.
Plunkett v. Reeves Apothecary, Inc. 351 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
where the court declared unenforceable a noncompetition clause in the sale of a motorcycle sales and service business which failed to specify a time limit.
Kingsman Enterprises, Inc. v. Bakerfield Elec. Co., Inc. 339 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
4th Cir. 1968); (La.App.
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. 330 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Orleans, 1936, ; Mayo v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Company, U.S.C.A.
Distinguished Texas Industries, Inc. v. Dupuy & Dupuy Develop., Inc. 227 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
486 , (1943); Giuffria Realty Company v. Kathman-Landry, Inc., Brown v. Benton Creosoting Co., Inc., supra; (La.
Cattle Farms, Inc. v. Abercrombie 211 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
Lindstrom v. Sauer, La.App., ; Alliance Trust Co. v. Streater, 182 La.
Hebert v. Wiegand 207 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
562 (La.App.Orleans, 1937); Mayo v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Company, 274 F.2d 320 (5 Cir. 1960), and authorities cited therein.
Hirsh v. Miller 187 So. 2d 709 La. 1966
(1936) ; J. Alfred Mouton Inc. v. Hebert (La.App.)
Hirsh v. Miller 181 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
172 (La.App.1st Cir. 1940)
Hirsh v. Miller 167 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
172 ; Lindstrom v. Sauer, La.App., ; accord, Meraux v. R. R. Barrow, Inc., *543 219 La.
Johnson v. Kinchen 160 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Lindstrom v. Sauer, La.App., ; Alliance Trust Co. v. Streater, 182 La.
Shreveport Sash & Door Company v. Ray 159 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
In Lindstrom v. Sauer, La.App., (Orl.1936), it was held that where one who incorporates himself for convenience, being in truth the sole owner of the corporation, and who conveys the good will of that corporation, may not thereafter in answer to a suit for damages by virtue of his personal wrongdoings, cloak himself behind the corporate entity he ha
National Surety Corporation v. Pope 147 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
[2] Lindstrom v. Sauer, La.App., ; Keller v. Haas, 202 La.
Brown v. Benton Creosoting Co. 147 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Orleans, 1936, ; Mayo v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Company, U.S.C.A.
Ballero v. Heslin 128 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
The case of Lindstrom v. Sauer, La.App., , is of interest in connection with the point we are now discussing.
Kennedy v. Pope Park, Inc. 109 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
486 , , the Supreme Court said: “It is well settled that where an individual forms a corporation of which he is the sole and only stockholder or owns such control of the stock that the act of the corporation is his own, then he may not use the screen of corporate entity to absolve himself from responsibility.” In Lindstrom v. Sauer, La.App., , we said: “The courts of Louisiana have had occasion to pass upon this question in a number of cases and the jurisprudence seems to be well settled that, w
Meraux v. R. R. Barrow, Inc. 52 So. 2d 863 La. 1951
Lindstrom v. Sauer, La.App., ; Alliance Trust Co. v. Streater, 182 La.
Keller v. Haas 12 So. 2d 238 La. 1943
Lindstrom v. Sauer, La.App., ; Alliance Trust Co. v. Streater, 182 La.
J. Alfred Mouton, Inc. v. Hebert 199 So. 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
See Lindstrom v. Sauer, La.App., Orleans, .