DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Manuel v. Bradford, 166 So. 657.

13 citing documents.

  • Arnold v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 236 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    In support of the ruling the opinion cited Manuel v. Bradford, La.App., ; Clark v. DeBeer, La.App., 188 So.
  • Sittig v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 149 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    In support of the ruling the, opinion cited Manuel v. Bradford, La.App., ; Clark v. De Beer, La.App., 188 So.
  • Dilworth v. Roberts 138 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    In support of the ruling the opinion cited Manuel v. Bradford, La.App., ; Clark v. De Beer, La.App., 188 So.
  • Homeland Insurance Co. of America v. Marshall 138 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    144 , (citing the following cases: Manuel v. Bradford, La.App., ; Clark v. De Beer, La.App., 188 So.
  • Le Beau v. Baton Rouge Bus Co. 136 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    In support of the ruling the opinion cited Manuel v. Bradford, La.App., ; Clark v. De Beer, La.App., 188 So.
  • Youngblood v. Robison 118 So. 2d 431 La. 1960
    In support of the ruling the opinion cited Manuel v. Bradford, La.App., ; Clark v. DeBeer, La.App., 188 So.
  • Duree v. STATE, DEPT. OF INSTITUTIONS 96 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Orleans, ; Buckley v. Featherstone Garage, 2 Cir., 11 La.App.
  • Duree v. State ex rel. Department of Institutions 96 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Orleans, ; Buckley v. Featherstone Garage, 2 Cir., 11 La.App.
  • Sangree v. Grilletta 42 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    That the other motorist may expect him to stop in such a neutral ground where the light has changed against 'him, we said in Manuel v. Bradford, La.App., .
  • Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc. 24 So. 2d 292 La. 1945
    the Court of Appeal also commented upon its decision in the Thomas case holding that the doctrine announced in that case should not be extended beyond the limit applied therein.
  • Kientz v. Charles Dennery 17 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    in which we said: "But this doctrine should be applied only where the danger is open and obvious and where a reasonably prudent person would observe it and avoid it, for ordinarily a driver may assume that other persons will obey the law and will not attempt to cross in violation of a `right of way'.
  • Laborde v. Schwartzenburg 188 So. 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    Manuel v. Bradford, La.App., ; Buckley v. Featherstone Garage, 11 La.App.
  • Iglesias v. Campbell 170 So. 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
    Orleans Circuit) , which referred to the Buckley Case, supra.