DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Morris v. Hava, 180 So. 216.

16 citing documents.

  • Tillman v. Johnson 610 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    1st Cir. 1962); (La.App.Orl.
  • Robinson v. Palm Apartments 353 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    1st Cir. 1962), certiorari denied
  • Weiland v. King 281 So. 2d 688 La. 1973
    See Morris v. Hava, La.App., (1938).
  • Hurley v. JC Penney Company 140 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    The landlord-tenant contract existed between Mr. Hurley and Mr. Russell, and, as was held in Morris v. Hava, La.App., , the wife of a tenant is considered as a third person.
  • Matranga v. Hilman 94 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    App., ; Hughes v. Abate, La.
  • Green v. Billa 86 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1956
    196 ; Morris v. Hava, La.App., ."
  • Dillon v. Miranne 11 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    Morris v. Hava, La.App., ; Lervick v. White Top Cabs, La.App., .
  • Blanke v. Miranne 11 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    Morris v. Hava, La.App., ; Lervick v. White Top Cabs, La.App.
  • Lervick v. White Top Cabs 10 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    See Morris v. Hava, La.App., .
  • Johnson v. Nichel 6 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    196 ; Morris v. Hava, La.App., .
  • Wallace v. Meyer 4 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    196 ; Morris v. Hava, La.App., ."
  • Roppolo v. Pick 4 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1941
    196 ; Morris v. Hava, La.App., ; Hughes et al. v. Abate, La.App., .
  • Staes v. Terranova 4 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    196 ; Morris v. Hava, La.App., ."
  • Hughes v. Abate 2 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    196 ; Morris v. Hava, La.App., .
  • Duplain v. Wiltz 194 So. 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    This view is fortified by the language of the Supreme Court in Klein v. Young.” (no writ of review was asked for), this court followed the ruling in the Heath and Tesoro cases and held that the wife of the lessee could not recover because she was not the lessee.
  • Bradley v. Yancy 195 So. 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    546 ; Morris v. Hava, La.App., ; Brodtman v. Finerty, 116 La.