Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hecker v. Betz, 172 So. 816.

15 citing documents.

  • Slocum v. Lamartiniere 369 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
  • Finn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION 141 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
    Orleans, 1937, ; Labostrie v. Weber, 15 La.App.
  • Toye v. Browne-McHardy Clinic 131 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    303 ; Hecker v. Betz, La.App., ; Stephens, for Use and Benefit of Stephens v. Catalano, La.App., , and others.
  • Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation 112 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    La.App.1937, , is therefore not applicable to the instant case.
  • Brown v. Remington Rand, Inc. 81 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    303 ; Hecker v. Betz, La.App., ; Gonsoulin v. Southern Amusement Company, La.App., ; Speed v. Page, La.App., ; Id., 222 La.
  • Landry v. Fuselier 78 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    529 , , Hecker v. Betz, La.App., and Gonsoulin v. Southern Amusement Company, La.App.
  • Speed v. Page 59 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    Hecker v. Betz, La.App., , in which a plumber performing services for the 'benefit of an employer engaged in the undertaking business was allowed recovery, the Court specifically declaring: “But even though construction or remodeling work may not be a part of the regular business of the employer, if, in furtherance of his regular business, wh
  • Blackburn v. Chenet 42 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
  • Prater v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York 38 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., and Franz v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York, supra.
  • Gonsoulin v. Southern Amusement Co. 32 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., , is decisive of the question.
  • Gallien v. Judge 28 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., and Collins v. Spielman, 200 La.
  • Franz v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York 7 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
  • Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co. 198 So. 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    466 ; and many other cases cited therein; also Hecker v. Betz, La.App., .
  • Rayburn v. De Moss 193 So. 579 La. 1940
    885 , and Hecker v. Betz, La.App., , are not in point, because in those cases, the court concluded that the injured workman had performed a service directly or indirectly in connection with the hazardous part of the defendant’s business.
  • Robichaux v. Realty Operators, Inc. 191 So. 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    430 ; Hecker v. Betz, La.App., ; Wright v. Louisiana Ice & Utilities Company, 14 La.App.