Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hecker v. Betz, 172 So. 816.
- Slocum v. Lamartiniere 369 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
-
Finn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION
141 So. 2d 852
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Orleans, 1937, ; Labostrie v. Weber, 15 La.App.
-
Toye v. Browne-McHardy Clinic
131 So. 2d 413
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
303 ; Hecker v. Betz, La.App., ; Stephens, for Use and Benefit of Stephens v. Catalano, La.App., , and others.
-
Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation
112 So. 2d 741
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
La.App.1937, , is therefore not applicable to the instant case.
-
Brown v. Remington Rand, Inc.
81 So. 2d 121
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
303 ; Hecker v. Betz, La.App., ; Gonsoulin v. Southern Amusement Company, La.App., ; Speed v. Page, La.App., ; Id., 222 La.
-
Landry v. Fuselier
78 So. 2d 442
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
529 , , Hecker v. Betz, La.App., and Gonsoulin v. Southern Amusement Company, La.App.
-
Speed v. Page
59 So. 2d 138
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
Hecker v. Betz, La.App., , in which a plumber performing services for the 'benefit of an employer engaged in the undertaking business was allowed recovery, the Court specifically declaring: “But even though construction or remodeling work may not be a part of the regular business of the employer, if, in furtherance of his regular business, wh
- Blackburn v. Chenet 42 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
-
Prater v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York
38 So. 2d 663
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
App., and Franz v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York, supra.
-
Gonsoulin v. Southern Amusement Co.
32 So. 2d 94
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
App., , is decisive of the question.
-
Gallien v. Judge
28 So. 2d 101
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
App., and Collins v. Spielman, 200 La.
- Franz v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York 7 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
-
Brownfield v. Southern Amusement Co.
198 So. 670
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
466 ; and many other cases cited therein; also Hecker v. Betz, La.App., .
-
Rayburn v. De Moss
193 So. 579
La. 1940
885 , and Hecker v. Betz, La.App., , are not in point, because in those cases, the court concluded that the injured workman had performed a service directly or indirectly in connection with the hazardous part of the defendant’s business.
-
Robichaux v. Realty Operators, Inc.
191 So. 326
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
430 ; Hecker v. Betz, La.App., ; Wright v. Louisiana Ice & Utilities Company, 14 La.App.