Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bell v. Staring, 170 So. 502.

14 citing documents.

Johnson v. Calcasieu Parish Sheriff's Dept. 951 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Ledet v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark 327 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Coastal Erection Co., Inc. v. Milan Engineering Co. 305 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Harsh though it may seem to the rushed and often harried attorney, is applicable here.
McCallon v. Travelers Insurance Company 302 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Vercher v. D. J. Mcduffie Well Service, Inc. 271 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Pounds v. Yancy 224 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Bell v. Staring, La.App., .
LeBlanc v. Thibodaux 162 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Bell v. Staring, La.App., ; Zatarain v. Portera, La.App., .
Washington v. Harvey 124 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Bell v. Staring, La.App., .
Evans v. Hamner 24 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
App., , the court held that the plaintiff may rebut the presumption of abandonment by showing that the failure to prosecute the suit was caused by circumstances beyond his control and the failure to prosecute the suit must be attributable to the failure or neglect of the plaintiff to take some action in court whereby t
Metairie Bank in Liquidation v. Lecler 1 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Sliman v. Araguel 200 So. 280 La. 1941
In support of this contention counsel cites Bell v. Staring, La.App., .
Bell v. Canal Bank & Trust Co. 190 So. 359 La. 1939
Harrisonburg-Catahoula State Bank v. Meyers 185 So. 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Bell v. Staring, La.App., .
Bell v. Canal Bank & Trust Co. 184 So. 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938