Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Butler v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 173 So. 209.

13 citing documents.

  • City of New Orleans v. Wiener 197 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    for the court in that case to detennine whether the defendant was legally entitled to recover as separate items of damage the cost of constructing the sidewalks and paving the street; but the court stated that the jurispiudence indicated that the defendant was legally entitled to his claims, and cited in support of this statement a Court of Appeal case, .
  • State, Department of Highways v. Burleigh 160 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    (Orleans App.1937); (1st Cir.App.1960); State ex rel.
  • Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Mire 140 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Louisiana Highway Commission v. Treadaway, La.App., , but more recently as "severance damages", Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Primeaux, La.
  • Texas Gas Transmission Corporation v. Fuselier 133 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    The jurisprudence (see Louisiana Highway Commission v. Treadaway, La.App., ) indicates that defendant is legally entitled to this claim.
  • Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Harang 131 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Louisiana Highway Commission v. *402 Treadaway, La.App., , but more recently as "severance damages", Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Primeaux, La.
  • Central La. El. Co. v. Covington & St. Tammany L. & I. Co. 131 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Louisiana Highway Commission v. Treadaway, La.App., ; Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Primeaux, La.App., ; Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Barbe, supra.
  • City of Shreveport v. Worley 121 So. 2d 506 La. 1960
    for the court in that case to determine whether the defendant was legally entitled to recover as separate items of damage the cost of constructing the sidewalks and paving the street; but the court stated that the jurisprudence indicated that the defendant was legally entitled to his claims, and cited in support of this statement a Court of Appeal case, .
  • Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. De Bouchel 117 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    We ourselves, in Louisiana Highway Commission v. Treadaway, La.App., , discussed this question exhaustively and possibly exhaustingly.
  • City of New Orleans v. Giraud 115 So. 2d 349 La. 1959
    App., ) indicates that defendant is legally entitled to this claim.
  • Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Wyatt Lumber Co. 60 So. 2d 713 La. 1952
    The plaintiff contends that the defendant is precluded from contesting its right to expropriate the property and that the only right the defendant has is to contest the price to be paid for the land sought to be expropriated under the holding in the cases of Louisiana Highway Commission v. Treadaway, La.App., ; Louisiana Highway Commission v. Bradberry, La.App., 193 So.
  • Westwego Canal & Terminal Co. v. Louisiana Highway Commission 9 So. 2d 389 La. 1942
    185 , decided in 1937, and Louisiana Highway Commission v. Treadway, La.App., , decided in 1937; Id., La.App., 175 So.
  • Jarnagin v. Louisiana Highway Commission 5 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    Louisiana Highway Commission v. Treadaway et al., La.App., , Id., 175 So.
  • Louisiana Highway Commission v. Bradberry 193 So. 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    The contentions which the various landowners make, with the sole exception of E. Hingle and Leontine Treadaway Hingle, , in which we held that the property owners were not entitled to suspensive appeals and that their right to recovery should be limited to the actual value of the land taken and the consequential damage sustained as the result of the construction of the new highway.