DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cutitto v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 172 So. 812.

16 citing documents.

  • Northwest Ins. Co. v. Borg-Warner Corp. 501 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    Co., (Orl.App.1937), (Orl.App.1943), modified on other grounds
  • Cox v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board 165 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Co., La.App., ; Levy v. McWilliams, 13 La.App.
  • Succession of Franz 133 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
  • Succession of Roth 133 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Broussard v. Dumas Chevrolet Company 120 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
  • Daly v. Abramson 117 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    App., ; Egan v. Hotel Grunewald Company, Ltd., 129 La.
  • Randazzo v. Lucas 106 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    750, 753 , the Supreme Court refused to allow the fees claimed on behalf of some of the'experts, saying: *497 “ ‘Some of the experts who testified did not appear on the trial of the rule to tax costs and submit themselves to an examination by defendants.’ “See, also, Cutitto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, La.App., .
  • Rosenquist v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company 78 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
  • Womack v. Burka 14 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1943
    Co., La.App., , we followed the rule laid down in the Egan case, and refused to tax as costs the charges of a doctor who had testified as an expert witness, saying: "* * * He did not appear and submit himself to cross-examination, but relied on the statement of counsel for plaintiff to substantiate his claim for an expert's fe
  • Penouilh v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 1 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    See, also, Cutitto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, La.App., .
  • Jiles v. Venus Community Benev. Aid Ass'n 195 So. 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    It is true that, in Cutitto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, La.App., , we retained the jurisdiction of an appeal from a judgment involving the taxing of costs, which totaled only $935, though the principal issue in that case had been decided by the Supreme Court.
  • Hall v. Mengel Co. 191 So. 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    Co., La.App., ; Nash v. Lococo, La.App., 182 So.
  • McCoy v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corporation 190 So. 391 La. 1939
    Cutitto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., La.App., .
  • Stieffel v. Valentine Sugars, Inc. 185 So. 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    Cutitto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, La.App., : On two subsequent dates Dr. Miller lost two more hours in looking for some pictures, and spent another hour on November 24th examining some new pictures of plaintiff with Dr. Bradburn.
  • Turner v. Peoples Industrial Life Ins. Co. 180 So. 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    750, 753 , the Supreme Court refused to allow the fees claimed on behalf of some of the experts, saying: “Some of the experts who testified did not appear on the trial of the rule to tax costs and submit themselves to an examination by defendants.” See, also, Cutitto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, La.App., .
  • Duvernay v. Airey 172 So. 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937